Remove this Banner Ad

2026 Trade / FA Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Harry O
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I think we need to get someone younger for Nick, someone who can work with Nick for the next decade or so.
A problem we have is the lack of elite skills and the few games in our youth. Neale could help the team now and help the transition, to Swadling for example. My first reaction to Neale was no. I also took the p155 and suggested Zorko was better. If it doesn’t happen, okay. But it could be really really really good.
 
Spot on. I didn’t like him taking a veiled swipe at GW, but that was actual information from within the club that he let out which is rare.

Him and Corn. I was listening to fireball this morning thinking we might finally get some praise… I was left scratching my head thinking we can’t win with these flogs.
I missed fireball. The station I was on had flogball.
 
On Neale. Margins are fine in this league. We could realistically be sitting at 6-2 right now with an ounce of luck and looking in good shape for another top 4 birth. You add Neale to our mix and we would probably be 7-1. For me it ultimately boils down to a thought process that you’re only doing it if you think you’re close and that could well be an indicator of where we think we are. It seems a no brainer to me.
Nick and Neale would be amazing.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

David King has always been positive towards us. Even this morning he was trying give credit to Collingwood and Corn was having nothing of it.
Kingy made an awful lot of sense with what he was saying! For those that didn’t listen in his thought process was that our strong conversion meant we had less repeat I50’s, more centre clearances and more opportunities for them to impose themselves in areas they had an edge which then inflated their statistical dominance. I couldn’t go all the way with him and I think a bit of it was to stir Corn over his Pendles stuff, but he made some decent observations, IMO.
 
He'll be 33 this month.
You've got to look at and recruit for multiple time frames. Why keep Crisp and Elliott if we're not trying to be good in the next few years. The answer is simply that we want to be good in the next few years and Neale would help with that. He's still a star and inside mid is probably the least team dependent role, so he'd slot straight in like Titch did. Make it happen Leppa.
 
Kingy made an awful lot of sense with what he was saying! For those that didn’t listen in his thought process was that our strong conversion meant we had less repeat I50’s, more centre clearances and more opportunities for them to impose themselves in areas they had an edge which then inflated their statistical dominance. I couldn’t go all the way with him and I think a bit of it was to stir Corn over his Pendles stuff, but he made some decent observations, IMO.
I agree with King. We didn't get to see a pattern of play from them intercepting in D50 or from their kick ins. It happened so little. Would we have locked it in? It's a different situation to those half back intercepts where they have someone positioned directly opposite the play for an immediate switch when they do win it - the ground is too narrow for that when they win it deep in defence.
 
You've got to look at and recruit for multiple time frames. Why keep Crisp and Elliott if we're not trying to be good in the next few years. The answer is simply that we want to be good in the next few years and Neale would help with that. He's still a star and inside mid is probably the least team dependent role, so he'd slot straight in like Titch did. Make it happen Leppa.
He looks like he's got at least 2 or 3 years of quality football ahead of him. He would improve us
 
He’s still one of the best mids in the competition. We’ve got a 38 year old still as a critical piece of our team, and our mantra is all about no limits on age. Not mutually exclusive at all with bringing in younger partners for Nick - very reminiscent of the Titch addition, just a much better player
He played a GF after having been declared dead the week before. Imagine what he could do with the resters overseeing him!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

We'll keep it unless we use it for someone like King. If we get King and neale, we're back in premiership contention.
I don’t think we will trade for a FA
Prob go for someone like Lewis that costs nothing
 
He looks like he's got at least 2 or 3 years of quality football ahead of him. He would improve us
It sounds really unlikely but he'd be fantastic for us; we'd be in it up to our eyeballs with him.

Everyone seems to judge a list by the glamour roles - centre square mids and power forwards - so we heard for ages that Carlton had a great list - despite being really bad in most other roles. Dogs much the same. And our list is trash - even though it's just a player or two away.

Meanwhile, last year 3 of the 4 prelim finalists - us, Cats and Hawks were nothing special in the centre square and us, and Lions weren't much chop in terms of power forwards. The minor premiers weren't much in the centre square either.

Improve the centre square and we can win the flag. Improve the centre square and KPF and we'd be favourites - we're going to have a very strong defence and flankers for the next few years - even post Pendles and Sidey. Poach a gun mid and we're ready to win it again.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

OK, i didn't know that, i've just heard he wanted to go back to WA and assumed his family was from there. Well, he's wife and children are.
I’m not sure being close to his wife is much of a draw for him
 
Is Neale an UFA? If so it would be monumentally stupid to pass on him regardless of age. I’m all for resetting the list but if you lose no draft capital from the move you do it 100/100 times.

He literally won a GF for his team last season. The only reason he didn’t get a Norm Smith is because he played 44% TOG. But in that time he turned the game with 17 touches, 7 clearances and 7 SI including a goal and an assist.

Imagine yesterday’s game but in addition to team defence, smart skills and tactical nous we also dominate clearances instead of getting smashed in them. We could contend from next year with him and some upgrade forward of the ball instead of waiting in hope a few more years.
 
It sounds really unlikely but he'd be fantastic for us; we'd be in it up to our eyeballs with him.

Everyone seems to judge a list by the glamour roles - centre square mids and power forwards - so we heard for ages that Carlton had a great list - despite being really bad in most other roles. Dogs much the same. And our list is trash - even though it's just a player or two away.

Meanwhile, last year 3 of the 4 prelim finalists - us, Cats and Hawks were nothing special in the centre square and us, and Lions weren't much chop in terms of power forwards. The minor premiers weren't much in the centre square either.

Improve the centre square and we can win the flag. Improve the centre square and KPF and we'd be favourites - we're going to have a very strong defence and flankers for the next few years - even post Pendles and Sidey. Poach a gun mid and we're ready to win it again.
All 4 share in common ripping small forward groups when they’re on which for me has become the defining area of the ground for premiership success. Unfortunately the loss of Hill took too big a residual toll on us by year end and it’s why I’d like us to find another in the MSD (if possible).
I agree with King. We didn't get to see a pattern of play from them intercepting in D50 or from their kick ins. It happened so little. Would we have locked it in? It's a different situation to those half back intercepts where they have someone positioned directly opposite the play for an immediate switch when they do win it - the ground is too narrow for that when they win it deep in defence.
The reason I went most of the way and wasn’t fully on board is that it draws down our score. It would have levelled I50’s and contested ball to a degree, but maybe forcing them to go the length of the field opens up better looks because they’re going in to less congestion? They then convert better and again we see more centre clearance which they dominate. We’ve still got to find say another 3-4 goals from those scrounged I50’s as well.

It’s definitely not as straight forward as Corn made it out to be that statistical dominance should mean scoreboard dominance (primarily because it largely discredits the good work we did), but I’m not totally convinced you’d see the same or similar result if we converted worse.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom