- Apr 2, 2013
- 12,979
- 20,898
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
You've just contradicted yourself here.On the subject of interstate vs international growth (if you're assuming interstate migration being better as footy fans), Darwin doesn't fare well there either.
The Muval Report captures interstate migration stats.
In the latest report (covering 2024), the ACT had the highest rate, with 1.2 people coming from interstate for every person leaving.
The NT has the lowest, with 0.8 people coming for every person leaving. Darwin itself is lower again at 0.72.
The three positive areas of Sydney in terms of internal migration were all in Western Sydney.
View attachment 2483680
This is just a single-year snapshot, but the report says Darwin is consistently poor.
"Greater Darwin has faced a consistent downturn, sliding further into negative migration territory year after year."
TLDR; Darwin's (relatively low) population growth isn't coming from interstate.
Interestingly, in 2024, more than 50% more Melbournians than Sydneysiders moved to Canberra. Bodes well for a premade footy-supporting population.
On one hand growth and projected population growth is considered essential for team 20. Yet now you argue the fact footy loving Melbournians are moving to Canberra should work in their favour.
Almost like passion for the sport and a proven track record should count.
In which case Darwin and the NT leave Canberra in the dust




