So what I am getting from that is: it's a bad look. And it is. Of course it is. It was 4 or 5 years ago when it was raised in public in the White House.
Because it was Obama, media didn't follow it up.
Trying to link the prosecutor to investigations is tenuous. If anything WAS amiss, it was lucky for Biden that the entire EU, the IMF and others were lobbying to have the prosecutor sacked because... wait... he WASN'T prosecuting the big fish?
So Biden, fully aware that this prosecutor would probably NEVER prosecute anyone like his son's employer, was WRONG to get the guy sacked? It doesn't scan.
I say again: the guy was notorious for not prosecuting people with exactly the job description of Biden Jr.
Well I guess the GOP doesn't give a stuff about those niceties.?
The most pertinent sentence to me was this: "When the news broke that a CIA whistle-blower launched a complaint about President Trump’s apparent request that Ukraine investigate Biden and his son Hunter’s ties to Ukrainian gas giant Burisma, Joe had no choice but to respond."
ie Joe the Front Runner was the most instant and spectacular victim of Pelosi's choice to pursue impeachment.
How this will work out remains to be seen.