- Thread starter
- #26
Originally posted by DaveW
Lehmann has been coming in at #6 when the work has been done. That is, a performance wasn't really needed from a team point of view. Unlike Mark Waugh whose failures at #4 triggered collapses. Lehmann showed in the recent one-dayer what he can do when given the responcibility up the order.
that doesnt erase the fact that Lehmann has added nothing to the team since mark waugh was dropped. #4 is a harder spot to bat than #6 anyway. 100 at #4 is worth just as much as a 100 at #6 and the fact that he is allowed to get away with failures just because the rest of the batters are pulling their weight is a bit of a cop out.
perhaps he'd be good as a specialist one day player ala michael bevan. they are very different games and a performance in one form doesnt suggest form in the other.





