Portia
#DrewBlood
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2001
- Posts
- 50,502
- Reaction score
- 24,869
- Location
- Fragile bastion of liberalism
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Muckbuckle Dolmens
He deserved to get the wind sent up him, like every other case of media defamation involving the AFL has done in recent memory. This is going further than anything against, say, Sam Newman.Originally posted by Joffaboy
Because he deserves to be sued. It will serve notice that you just cant say unsubstainiated defamatory rubbish on the public record and get away with it.
The Port Adeaide Football Club, I'm sure, would demand a full retraction, and as is their usual fashion, would try to deal with it in a sensible fashion. They wouldn't, however, be in a position to a) dominate the national primetime slot that Collingwood do through Eddie, nor b) speak with the authority of the PAFC as well as the apparent authority of Channel Nine (who obviously OKed Eddie's tirade), and thus bully the rest of the media into agreeing if they want to keep credibility.Let me ask put forward a senerio.
A Victorian club had been knocked back by the AFL when they wanted the go ahead with a fund raising exercise, and in the following week Port Adelaide got the go ahead to do something similiar (but not quite the same) as the Victorian club.
The parochial minority of the Victorian media and supporters are up in arms over the decision and proclaims this is again proof that the AFL favours interstate sides.
This bubbles along in the media and on footy forums such as bigfooty.
It is still fresh in the minds of footy followers when a media personality openly states on a radion broadcast that the AFL has been bribed by the interstate club so they could get the go ahead.
The furore from across would be (understandably) huge.
I agree. Yet why is this the only case which is ending in real legal action, despite forthcoming on-air apologies and so on? Its because Rowe is a small fish.Now in the above situation the club and the ruling body have had their reputations sullied. This could affect all types of sponsorships, and deals such as TV rights. The two parties have every right to test the claims of bribery in a court of law where evidence is tested and judged.
Also, Eddie's influence (and national broadcast of this rumour during the high-rating game of the week) means that the media are leery of helping him out - which they more than likely would do if he was a more recognised, similar person from the AFL/VFL like Doug Hawkins.
I'd hope mine would act with more discretion and not set out to ruin careers of ex-players when the same apologies are forthcoming as in other cases in the AFL that are almost invariably dismissed.I say good on you Collingwood and Umpire Schmitt. If my club was defamed in such an appalling manner I hope they would react in the same way.




