Asgardian
Bigfooty Jedi
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2000
- Posts
- 34,895
- Reaction score
- 7,931
- Location
- Old mansville
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide Magpies
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

As far as im concerned its fair game. Most of the stuff looted will be damaged anyway and its up to the government and various companies to replace it free of charge anyway.
Let the looters loot in peace and get on to more important things I think. Aslong as sharing occurs it cant do too much harm
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
LOL wat?
Looting is only a problem if it turns violent. Otherwise its just like rubbish pick up day. If its on the street or the doors wide open, take what you want/need and rock on. Someone else besides you should pay for it after all the crap you are going through/have been through. Aslong as your not greedy its all good
Who are these wonderful people that replace all the stuff that's been looted?
The multinational corporations who will benefit from a rebuilt Christchurch in the long run. Insurance companies and the government can take care of the rest
You realize that not everyone has insurance? The government will take care of the rest? You're living in dreamworld.
There will be an out pouring of donations and the government will provide money. People effected by the tragedy will receive financial assistance, but it surely will not cover everything.
You would be happy if you're house was partially damaged by the earthquake, then looters broke in and took all of your belongings "It's ok guys take what you want, the government will replace everything".
The government should take care of the rest. Anything less is a complete failure on there part. This is one of many reasons we pay taxes for
I wouldnt mind aslong as it wasnt personal belongings like photos and crap. Im pretty sure people in Christchurch arnt running home praying there TV survived the quake. Its not really that valid atm so if someone does take it then who cares really
What if you have expensive family heirlooms? Think they are gonna leave that stuff alone coz it might have personal significance. I can't believe i'm even having this argument. Can't believe you can't admit your logic might be a little flawed.
Not only are these people thieves, they are also preying on people that have just lost alot/everything. They are scum.
If it looks like a antique than leave it. My logic is flawed because your understanding of it is flawed. Looting is "take what you can carry" theft so it generally involves small items. Things like Ipods, TV, maybe some cigs and booze, a little bit of chocolate for desert and bobs ya uncle
In your example well its more stupid than scummy but the general idea of looting isnt really a bad one in the grand scheme of things.
You think people are not gonna take your great grandfathers antique watch coz it might be sentimental?
lol Embers.
Reminds me of the riots/looting that always ensues in the Simpsons when something happens.

I'd totally loot shops. Not houses though.
Dan murphys/Myer/David Jones/DickSmith etc.
Would not care about stealing from them. Wouldn't go out to rob the local milkbar....
Looting/stealing from big companies is acceptable imo