Remove this Banner Ad

AFL Round 6

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

KP, if you think NM are certainties & have better forwards than Port then you are not as smart as you think.

Port's combination of Gray, Ebert, Motlop, Westhoff, C.Cornes & even Rodan & Hartlett in short bursts is far better than NM's combination of:

Petrie, Thomas, Hansen, Adams, Wright & Harvey in short bursts.

Gray is top quality, Motlop on his day is class, Westhoff is a good player & Ebert is more than handy....Rodan also has a knack for kicking goals too.
 
KP, if you think NM are certainties & have better forwards than Port then you are not as smart as you think.

Port's combination of Gray, Ebert, Motlop, Westhoff, C.Cornes & even Rodan & Hartlett in short bursts is far better than NM's combination of:

Petrie, Thomas, Hansen, Adams, Wright & Harvey in short bursts.

Gray is top quality, Motlop on his day is class, Westhoff is a good player & Ebert is more than handy....Rodan also has a knack for kicking goals too.

I dont think i'm smart, in fact my wife tells me the complete opposite...often. I understand how good Port can sound on paper but thats just not reality. They are mostly lazy shits that are more worried about the oranges at half time than winning games. Having said that North are no good things at $1.40 i do agree with that,just didnt agree that Port have a good fwd line thats all.
 
I dont think i'm smart, in fact my wife tells me the complete opposite...often. I understand how good Port can sound on paper but thats just not reality. They are mostly lazy shits that are more worried about the oranges at half time than winning games. Having said that North are no good things at $1.40 i do agree with that,just didnt agree that Port have a good fwd line thats all.

Fair enough, sorry for the over-reaction.....they are total tossers of a side at times i agree, its just i have won quite well picking when to bet on them & when to bet against them & i fancy this is a good spot for them in relative terms given the opponent. cheers.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Really liking Mumford > Warnock DT, albeit that he's $1.65 (sporting)

Mumford has the better form by some margin, and just came off a wet SCG game against a better opponent in Ottens and still racked up the points. He seems to have up and down days in terms of FF and FA, but he's been accumulating tackles and Warnock doesn't tackle much at all.

This should be another stoppage-ridden game at the SCG, and it should suit Mummy down to the ground.

Also considering Jack > 20.5 possessions, and Judd > 25.5 possessions.
 
Really liking Mumford > Warnock DT, albeit that he's $1.65 (sporting)

Mumford has the better form by some margin, and just came off a wet SCG game against a better opponent in Ottens and still racked up the points. He seems to have up and down days in terms of FF and FA, but he's been accumulating tackles and Warnock doesn't tackle much at all.

This should be another stoppage-ridden game at the SCG, and it should suit Mummy down to the ground.

Also considering Jack > 20.5 possessions, and Judd > 25.5 possessions.

Agree mumford looks like an easy one, but I cant figure out how to multi the head to head DT bets with anything, seems they arent allowed?
 
Really liking Mumford > Warnock DT, albeit that he's $1.65 (sporting)

Mumford has the better form by some margin, and just came off a wet SCG game against a better opponent in Ottens and still racked up the points. He seems to have up and down days in terms of FF and FA, but he's been accumulating tackles and Warnock doesn't tackle much at all.

This should be another stoppage-ridden game at the SCG, and it should suit Mummy down to the ground.

Also considering Jack > 20.5 possessions, and Judd > 25.5 possessions.

Love this bet SB - good pick up. On to it big time.
 
Anyone here like Syd vs. Carl over 158.5?

The Melbourne lowest scoring team of the round looks a nice play, anyone taken it yet?

Be careful of the conditions for tonight's game when considering the over...I'm actually looking at the under but waiting to learn more on the conditions.

Lowest scoring team bet is also a good one - on that too. Contenders are GC and possibly Carlton tonight if conditions are wet.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Round 6 tips:

  • 2.5units - Sydney/Essendon/Collingwood win @ $2.02 (S)
  • 2units - West Coast 1-39 @ $2.25 (SB)
  • 2units - Collingwood -35.5 @ $1.92 (C/SB)
  • 1.5units - Essendon -66.5 @ $1.92 (C/SB)
  • 1unit - St.Kilda 1-39 @ $2.85 (C)
 
2 Units - Demons - Lowest Score @ 2.1
1 unit - Swans H2H @ 1.7
1 Unit - Swans 1-39 @ 2.2

.2 Units - Multi - Sydney 1-39, North -16.5, Richmond H2H, Essendon -59.5, Collingwood H2h @ 11.33
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Anyone here like Syd vs. Carl over 158.5?

Thinking of dropping a few units on Sydney ML.

I'm also on Mumford over Warnock in fantasy points.

The Melbourne lowest scoring team of the round looks a nice play, anyone taken it yet?

not keen on the overs considering I am pretty sure it is raining? don't trust me on that but that is what I heard
 
Most Goals
Favourite - Garlett @ $9.00
Value - Waite @ $10.00


For people going with the first goal scorers thing on Sportingbet....Everitt and Armfield are the subs.

Yarran and Hampson are out, O'hAilpin and Armfield are in, while Pyke is in for Grundy for Sydney.
 
I'm very keen on Adelaide being the highest scoring team of the round at $51.

I can see them running away with it at AAMI and disregarding Round 1, St Kilda haven't been the defensive unit we have been use to.
 
Yarran and Hampson are out, O'hAilpin and Armfield are in, while Pyke is in for Grundy for Sydney.
Terrific, Sydney bring in a second ruckman whilst Carlton get rid of one. Mummy better still carve up Warnock!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

AFL Round 6

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top