76woodenspooners
Brownlow Medallist
I've spent the last two weeks in Northern Arizona not far from Flagstaff where the Collingwood players used to train. Where I am is at 1600m. Flagstaff is at 2100m.
Collingwood have chosen to spend this offseason at home, Buckley believing that greater benefits can be achieved with a program at home. (anybody got a link to that video?) And there has been some conjecture about the physiological benefits of altitude training and how long it lasts and whether it is worth the cost.
I've got no idea about what those physiological benefits are in terms of platelets and red blood cells and, and, and, and. (there are others here who do know more about that stuff and can talk about that side of it) But I do feel the effects on my own body and it has given me a little insight into what it's about.
Now I'm a long way from being an elite athlete, but I do a little bit of running to try and maintain some semblance of fitness. So I can compare the benefits of training here at 1600m with the training at sea level I normally do around the running tracks of Sydney Harbour.
So, what it's it all about? Well, it's about a number of different things ...
(1)
Firstly, forgive me for the jargon because I really don't know what I'm talking about ... but let me try: when we normally do any sustained physical activity there is a transition between the activity going from the anaerobic state (oxygen not needed) to the aerobic state (oxygen needed). You go for a run and skip off the mark, and after a short time you start to feel a bit stuffed as oxygen is depleted from muscles. You push through it and get into a rhythm of running and breathing and elevated heart rate and pretty soon you're able to get into a comfortable stride. Doing that at altitude, the transition seems to come a lot sooner and is deeper. ie: very quickly I feel totally spent, and pushing through it is a lot harder, but when I do I feel OKish (see point 2 below). I could imagine that with a bit more training it would get a lot better as the ability of the blood to carry oxygen improves, and that could be carried back to sea level as a benefit. Not sure how long those benefits would last - but I think those who claim that altitude training benefits don't last very long are referring to this. But there are other benefits too ...
(2)
Training at altitude is so much harder on the muscles. Doing anything at altitude is harder. Even vegitating in front of the TV at altitude burns more calories than at sea-level. Even when I'm not exercising I find myself gulping an extra breath of air. And when I am exercising I breath hard - I am practically trying to hyperventilate but I just can't seem to get enough oxygen - it's a weird sensation.
It's a way of loading up the muscles - imagine carrying around hand and leg weights for a few weeks - but altitude training has the added benefit of not loading up the joints in the way that weights do.
It makes training so much harder, so it gets the body in good training condition for the start of an off-season.
But I can't imagine that training in Melbourne's 40+ deg heat would be easy on the body either.
(3)
Northern Arizona is a beautiful part of the world,. It's inspiring and makes the desire to exercise that little bit easier.
The Grand Canyon ... It just takes your breath away. Some people think about it as a big, long hole in the ground. That's not strictly true. It's more like a big long, hole in the sky ... the plateau that the Colorado river has eroded to form the Grand Canyon is at around 2200m above sea level - the same height as Mt Kosciuszko, the highest point in mainland Australia.
But it's not just the Grand Canyon, the general vista in this part of the world is stunning - it is inspiring and it really does distract you from any pain in your muscles. And even ignoring the altitude, the treks here are physically demanding.
(4)
Some call it lazy, some call it efficient - it doesn't matter, it is the same thing. We adapt to our normal environment so that we burn as little energy as we can. Getting us out of our comfort zone forces us to burn a bit more energy.
But you don't need to come to Northern Arizona or even to altitude to get that.
(5)
We've all been on school camps. We can appreciate that footy players can bond with and get to know their team-mates so much better when they're living in each other's pockets for a few weeks away from home.
And like the last point, you don't need to come to Northern Arizona or to altitude to get that benefit.
----
So yes, I definitely feel that there are benefits of altitude training camps.
But how would it compare to going away and running up and down sand dunes as Port Adelaide did at the end of last year? The differences probably wouldn't be too great.
I could imagine that the change in this pre-season and going away on local camps and doing different programs could be a good change. But I would also be surprised if Collingwood never do an altitude training camp again.
Collingwood have chosen to spend this offseason at home, Buckley believing that greater benefits can be achieved with a program at home. (anybody got a link to that video?) And there has been some conjecture about the physiological benefits of altitude training and how long it lasts and whether it is worth the cost.
I've got no idea about what those physiological benefits are in terms of platelets and red blood cells and, and, and, and. (there are others here who do know more about that stuff and can talk about that side of it) But I do feel the effects on my own body and it has given me a little insight into what it's about.
Now I'm a long way from being an elite athlete, but I do a little bit of running to try and maintain some semblance of fitness. So I can compare the benefits of training here at 1600m with the training at sea level I normally do around the running tracks of Sydney Harbour.
So, what it's it all about? Well, it's about a number of different things ...
(1)
Firstly, forgive me for the jargon because I really don't know what I'm talking about ... but let me try: when we normally do any sustained physical activity there is a transition between the activity going from the anaerobic state (oxygen not needed) to the aerobic state (oxygen needed). You go for a run and skip off the mark, and after a short time you start to feel a bit stuffed as oxygen is depleted from muscles. You push through it and get into a rhythm of running and breathing and elevated heart rate and pretty soon you're able to get into a comfortable stride. Doing that at altitude, the transition seems to come a lot sooner and is deeper. ie: very quickly I feel totally spent, and pushing through it is a lot harder, but when I do I feel OKish (see point 2 below). I could imagine that with a bit more training it would get a lot better as the ability of the blood to carry oxygen improves, and that could be carried back to sea level as a benefit. Not sure how long those benefits would last - but I think those who claim that altitude training benefits don't last very long are referring to this. But there are other benefits too ...
(2)
Training at altitude is so much harder on the muscles. Doing anything at altitude is harder. Even vegitating in front of the TV at altitude burns more calories than at sea-level. Even when I'm not exercising I find myself gulping an extra breath of air. And when I am exercising I breath hard - I am practically trying to hyperventilate but I just can't seem to get enough oxygen - it's a weird sensation.
It's a way of loading up the muscles - imagine carrying around hand and leg weights for a few weeks - but altitude training has the added benefit of not loading up the joints in the way that weights do.
It makes training so much harder, so it gets the body in good training condition for the start of an off-season.
But I can't imagine that training in Melbourne's 40+ deg heat would be easy on the body either.
(3)
Northern Arizona is a beautiful part of the world,. It's inspiring and makes the desire to exercise that little bit easier.
The Grand Canyon ... It just takes your breath away. Some people think about it as a big, long hole in the ground. That's not strictly true. It's more like a big long, hole in the sky ... the plateau that the Colorado river has eroded to form the Grand Canyon is at around 2200m above sea level - the same height as Mt Kosciuszko, the highest point in mainland Australia.
But it's not just the Grand Canyon, the general vista in this part of the world is stunning - it is inspiring and it really does distract you from any pain in your muscles. And even ignoring the altitude, the treks here are physically demanding.
(4)
Some call it lazy, some call it efficient - it doesn't matter, it is the same thing. We adapt to our normal environment so that we burn as little energy as we can. Getting us out of our comfort zone forces us to burn a bit more energy.
But you don't need to come to Northern Arizona or even to altitude to get that.
(5)
We've all been on school camps. We can appreciate that footy players can bond with and get to know their team-mates so much better when they're living in each other's pockets for a few weeks away from home.
And like the last point, you don't need to come to Northern Arizona or to altitude to get that benefit.
----
So yes, I definitely feel that there are benefits of altitude training camps.
But how would it compare to going away and running up and down sand dunes as Port Adelaide did at the end of last year? The differences probably wouldn't be too great.
I could imagine that the change in this pre-season and going away on local camps and doing different programs could be a good change. But I would also be surprised if Collingwood never do an altitude training camp again.





).

(Hey, a drunk icon, WTF?).

