dees_best said:You need to conjure up a decent offer then.
What would you say is a good offer???
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
dees_best said:You need to conjure up a decent offer then.
Agreed. At one point was thought to be #3 material behind Goddard and Wells.Zombie said:Some of you are living in an absolute fantasy world.
Salopek is worth more than pick #9
Strongly disagree. He's a one trick pony. Opportunist goals and hail marys from outside 50. His upside is considerably less than Lance's is. It is demeaning to key position players to suggest otherwise.Dew is worth more than Whitnall.
You are putting a value on Whitnall at about a 3rd or 4th round pick or a fringe player. One of those things you throw in to give a first round pick a little more value.Pick #9 and Whitnall for Salopek would possibly be an even trade
Depends who you listen to, some media rumours have Whitnall going to the Crows, Stenglein to the Eagles and Kerr to the Blues. That is no late 2nd round player we are talking about. Sure it is only speculating but the fact is that some are talking of Whitnall like he still has a lot of value.Whitnall is worth far more to Carlton than he is to anyone else, you'd be lucky to get a late 2nd round pick for him, the guy is on the scrap heap.
I agree with ODN - Whilst Salopek would fetch more than #9, Whitnal > Dew in trade terms.Zombie said:Some of you are living in an absolute fantasy world.
Salopek is worth more than pick #9, Dew is worth more than Whitnall.
Pick #9 and Whitnall for Salopek would possibly be an even trade but I doubt Port would be that interested in picking up Whitnall anyway.
Whitnall is worth far more to Carlton than he is to anyone else, you'd be lucky to get a late 2nd round pick for him, the guy is on the scrap heap.
Thrawn said:Weak? I heard the draft was extremely strong this year... and who is to say that you cannot pick good youngster under pick #10. You look at all the good players in the league, most of them were not picked in the top 10, weak draft or not. You can still get quality if you draft smartly.
Rather have pick 9 and Whitnall than Dew - are you crazy? What are you hoping to get out of Dew? And how do you know for sure Salopek will be worth it?
We have enough midfielders - what we need are some players who can hold CHB/FB, a ruckman and a CHF who have big bodies. And are talented. Just need to look that extra bit harder.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Bluemike said:Thrawn,
How do we have enough midfielders? Our best midfielders are near the end of their careers.
If you look at most games this year, we got smashed in the midfield.
We were lucky that Adelaide didnt kick straight in that first qtr. We had 31 possessions for the first qtr.
We still need more quality midfielders. Kouta and Campo won't be elite midfielders when we're challenging again
We not only need a CHF, we need more ball winners.
Thrawn said:We have enough at the moment. We need a strong body at CHB, a small defender and perhaps a CHF and ruckman far more than we need midfielders. We have a few who will replace Kouta and Campo anyway - but we have nothing to replace Whitnall, French, Lappin and Thornton when he gets injuried.
We will pick up plenty of midfielders in the drafts to come - but I'm talking about the quality kids.
You are looking at one negative and applying this all year around. Midfield is a major problem, but we've got kids who we are grooming for these roles and absolutelt nothing for defence. We need some hard ball winners in the Ratten mould - but we'll be picking up those sort anyway. What we need is a young tall down back who can repleace Livo, a ruckman that can actually help out the midfielders and a CHF who can actually perform.
You do realise we need a good defense? Thornton and Teague is all we have - a balance is essential because we already have a decent forward line. A balance between the midfield and defence is what all good teams have - you will find that in every good team. Defence should be #1 priority because a) most of our young talent pool is directed at the midfield/forward line and b) there is zero depth is defense. Losing Thornton or Teague would be far worse than losing Kouta or Campo.
And a CHB. And a ruckman. And a small defender who can negate small forwards, because they've smashed us more often than the tall lumbering types. We always pick midfielders in the draft so we can afford a few draft picks to spend on the KEY positions which make a team. Otherwise there is no structure - you need it to be the best.
Go_Blueboyzzz said:ey blueprez if y ahad eny idea buddy of the upcoming draft u would agree wit me...the talent is ********...i think u should tune into the drafting system a bit better before ya comment...the drft is the worst ever...dont expect eny andrew alkers coz dere rnt eny available for us...expect ronnie delulio types.