Crankyhawk
Hall of Famer
probably has a $2 billion dollar exit penaltyyes Thats what I read too,
But I imagine it would be easy to join but hard process to leave.
Think easier not to be part of it all together in the first place.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 9
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
probably has a $2 billion dollar exit penaltyyes Thats what I read too,
But I imagine it would be easy to join but hard process to leave.
Think easier not to be part of it all together in the first place.
I’d imagine there are many contentious topics potentially unable to be publicly “debated” anymore.I see the crackers are out in full force declaring free speech in Australia to be dead without explaining exactly what they want to say that's now banned.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Who cares - we barely trade with the USATrump threatens 200% tariffs on French wines and champagnes after Macron rejects 'peace board' invite, escalating Greenland dispute tensions
I wonder what Tarriffs trump will impose on us if Albanese rejects the peace board offer.
I see the crackers are out in full force declaring free speech in Australia to be dead without explaining exactly what they want to say that's now banned.
We saw overstepping ministerial powers when Novak got deported and banned for two years.What is good for some now, may not be good for you later (under a different say more right wing government).
depending on who takes offense, it looks like things are going the way of whats happened in Britain.
Potentially criticism of anything against the government narrative.
Criticism of mass immigration - someone takes offense, get a knock on the door.
say free Palestine from the river to the sea, someone takes offense, potentially get a knock at the door.
Palestine action group could get listed as a prohibited group.
Tony Burke gets to label prohibited groups, who doesn't Tony Burke like? Does he want to use this to come after Australia First Influencers?
Politically....this could be a way for uni-party (Lib/Lab) to shut down One Nation before they begin and lock in the existing parties.
Just trawl over their candidates social media posts, find someone who takes offense to something they posted and lock them up until after the election.
Defending someone's right for protest and free speech does not mean we are advocating for them.
I don't love the laws either but the cookers might find themselves taken a bit more seriously of they didn't catastrophise everything which happens that they don't agree with.What is good for some now, may not be good for you later (under a different say more right wing government).
depending on who takes offense, it looks like things are going the way of whats happened in Britain.
Potentially criticism of anything against the government narrative.
Criticism of mass immigration - someone takes offense, get a knock on the door.
say free Palestine from the river to the sea, someone takes offense, potentially get a knock at the door.
Palestine action group could get listed as a prohibited group.
Tony Burke gets to label prohibited groups, who doesn't Tony Burke like? Does he want to use this to come after Australia First Influencers?
Politically....this could be a way for uni-party (Lib/Lab) to shut down One Nation before they begin and lock in the existing parties.
Just trawl over their candidates social media posts, find someone who takes offense to something they posted and lock them up until after the election.
Defending someone's right for protest and free speech does not mean we are advocating for them.
As opposed to you, who knows everything about everything.Marque Lawyers gotta be one of the more ignorant people on the planet.
Not surprising that's where you get your opinions from.
This. Hate speech is determined by the government in power at the time.What is good for some now, may not be good for you later (under a different say more right wing government).
depending on who takes offense, it looks like things are going the way of whats happened in Britain.
Potentially criticism of anything against the government narrative.
Criticism of mass immigration - someone takes offense, get a knock on the door.
say free Palestine from the river to the sea, someone takes offense, potentially get a knock at the door.
Palestine action group could get listed as a prohibited group.
Tony Burke gets to label prohibited groups, who doesn't Tony Burke like? Does he want to use this to come after Australia First Influencers?
Politically....this could be a way for uni-party (Lib/Lab) to shut down One Nation before they begin and lock in the existing parties.
Just trawl over their candidates social media posts, find someone who takes offense to something they posted and lock them up until after the election.
Defending someone's right for protest and free speech does not mean we are advocating for them.
We saw overstepping ministerial powers when Novak got deported and banned for two years.
I get that Novak is not popular but him posing a national public order threat was fantasy
that's right. There are people in prison in the UK for opposing the genocide in Palestine under their version of these laws.What a sad sad couple of days for people on either side of the political spectrum.
Albo has seen his chance after the Bondi attacks to control the masses further and jumped on the opportunity.
These laws have been a disaster in the UK and will do exactly what it’s done for Reform UK to One Nation.
Not under the new legislation because hate speech against Muslims is still allowed coz that’s a religion.![]()
Sonia Kruger vilified Muslim people in Australia but her comments were not 'racist'
The TV personality caused controversy in 2016 when she called for a ban on Muslim immigration, but the New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal found her comments did not meet the definition of racism.www.abc.net.au
Does Sonia Kruger deserve prison time for her opinion?
what about Eddie McGuireDoes Sonia Kruger deserve prison time for her opinion?
that would be funnier. Adam goodes took offense.I don’t think that’s what the law says.Not under the new legislation because hate speech against Muslims is still allowed coz that’s a religion.
I haven't been following it too closely, but on the radio last night I understood that one of the reasons the Greens didn't support the bill was because Muslims, not being a race, aren't protected.I don’t think that’s what the law says.
I believe that’s in regards to reciting religious textsI haven't been following it too closely, but on the radio last night I understood that one of the reasons the Greens didn't support the bill was because Muslims, not being a race, aren't protected.
Happy to be corrected, but whoever the commentator was (political correspondent from the Fin Rev, from memory) was pretty clear about that.
more specifically not being thrown in jail for quoting the quran (which may contain verses that could breach the new laws)I believe that’s in regards to reciting religious texts
And the gun owners too, who believe their rights are being diminished. Feels a bit NRA'y to me...I see the crackers are out in full force declaring free speech in Australia to be dead without explaining exactly what they want to say that's now banned.
more specifically not being thrown in jail for quoting the quran (which may contain verses that could breach the new laws)
I don't believe other religious texts have these issues.

