Anyone else notice they started to play the Richmond song at the end and then stopped and jumped it to the Brisbane one?!?!
Priceless! Just made the whole thing more amusing.
Yep. AFL really is amateur hour.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Anyone else notice they started to play the Richmond song at the end and then stopped and jumped it to the Brisbane one?!?!
Priceless! Just made the whole thing more amusing.
He’s another flog!Of course Ralph having a big sook.
After seeing the replay a few more times Im starting to shift more to the "it being a point" side.Not sure about that ARC decision...
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I thought it was a point.After seeing the replay a few more times Im starting to shift more to the "it being a point" side.
Anyone else notice they started to play the Richmond song at the end and then stopped and jumped it to the Brisbane one?!?!
Priceless! Just made the whole thing more amusing.

Spot on.Very poorly coached.
Why go to Brisbane to play a shoot out and not tag neale?
Dummy spit Dimma had enough?

Reckon filth will lose to cats but they will probably make it to GF

The review system giveth and the review system taketh away.The goal review system is a joke. And yes, I’m happy Richmond lost. But if it was Carlton losing a game to that, I’d be apoplectic. There is no way on this earth that the reviewer could be definitive on that. No way known. I’m over watching video review umpires watching things and then definitively declare there was a touch after watching a replay 100 times and apparently seeing a fingernail brush back. If the goal umpire and field umpires can’t see it, then there’s nothing doing and it should just be a goal.
Oh well, karma for the newnes goal that was over turned. SufferThe goal review system is a joke. And yes, I’m happy Richmond lost. But if it was Carlton losing a game to that, I’d be apoplectic. There is no way on this earth that the reviewer could be definitive on that. No way known. I’m over watching video review umpires watching things and then definitively declare there was a touch after watching a replay 100 times and apparently seeing a fingernail brush back. If the goal umpire and field umpires can’t see it, then there’s nothing doing and it should just be a goal.
The review was correct. It’s the goal umpire that had no definitive proof. He made an awful call.I thought it was a point.
But there is no way that there was definitive proof that it missed the goals, which is what is required to over-rule.
The mistake of four of their defenders all in similar spot and leave Daniher behind them would be torture.That was like watching us blow a lead with a minute to go
The review was correct. It’s the goal umpire that had no definitive proof. He made an awful call.
The review was correct. It’s the goal umpire that had no definitive proof. He made an awful call.
Great minds.Lynch missed. Umpire call was tentative and wrong. The review got the right result even if the umpire got it wrong initially.
Maybe two wrongs DO make a right.Goal umpire doesn't need definitive evidence. He makes his call and we are to trust the call, like any other decision over the 120 minutes!
Two mistakes. Should never have been called a goal. Should never have been overturned.