"Bad Boy" Ben

[crow87]

The advertiser is up to its same old tricks, trying to undermine confidence in Hudson and attempting to portray him as a "bad boy"-yes they used those words. Ok, he was out too late, an hour outside curfew I think it was, yes he broke team rules and yes he should have been punished and was. I think the club handled it very well. But really, now he's a "Bad boy"? Saying how he has lost the confidence of his team-mates and painting it like he's now on the outside? What a stupid comment from an even more ridiculous newspaper. But yes, I still read it every day. But No I get it for free at Uni
What are peoples thoughts on Huddo?

 

[Mad Dog]

My daughter....who constantly tries to stay up after her bedtime has put a poster of "Bad Boy Benny" up on her wall.

Clearly he has turned into a cult hero and role model for those looking to create anarchy and social deconstruction by trying to avoid their curfews.

I'm hoping the Advertiser will lead the wider community on this one and call for a lengthy jail term. What other chance do we have of saving the children ????????

 

[crow87]

My daughter....who constantly tries to stay up after her bedtime has put a poster of "Bad Boy Benny" up on her wall.

Clearly he has turned into a cult hero and role model for those looking to create anarchy and social deconstruction by trying to avoid their curfews.

I'm hoping the Advertiser will lead the wider community on this one and call for a lengthy jail term. What other chance do we have of saving the children ????????

Perhaps this will be their new way of subtly (or not so subtly) trying to get (particularly young people-ie towing the PP line) people to barrack for Port instead of the crows with small comments in each article.

 

[flackjack]

The advertiser is up to its same old tricks, trying to undermine confidence in Hudson and attempting to portray him as a "bad boy"-yes they used those words. Ok, he was out too late, an hour outside curfew I think it was, yes he broke team rules and yes he should have been punished and was. I think the club handled it very well. But really, now he's a "Bad boy"? Saying how he has lost the confidence of his team-mates and painting it like he's now on the outside? What a stupid comment from an even more ridiculous newspaper. But yes, I still read it every day. But No I get it for free at Uni
What are peoples thoughts on Huddo?

No surprise who the article was written by...

 

[crow87]

No surprise who the article was written by...

actually most of it was from his mate, he doesnt seem to like us much either though.

 

[McLeodMagic]

dw about ben. stuff club rules! ben is a superstar. yeah bad.
:

 

[relapse]

Perhaps this will be their new way of subtly (or not so subtly) trying to get (particularly young people-ie towing the PP line) people to barrack for Port instead of the crows with small comments in each article.

Ferret head has a habit of trying to portray Adelaide as being a morally corrupt side while Port are labelled the heros. Just further examples of him attempting to push Port's barrow through the powertiser.

 

[Mego Red]

I was in Bad Boy Bubby.

 

[beartoo]

Don't know why we bother giving credence to the Advertiser morons.

 

[High Voltage]

But it was the players / club that suspended him, not the 'Tiser.

I think it was clear that about half of Adelaide supporters, and most neutral supporters, thought it was an excessive penalty.

So I think it is a bit rich to try and blame the 'Tiser, (and you know who in particular) for running an agenda on this issue. The club has left itself open to it through its actions.

 

[AndrewJo]

But it was the players / club that suspended him, not the 'Tiser.

I think it was clear that about half of Adelaide supporters, and most neutral supporters, thought it was an excessive penalty.

So I think it is a bit rich to try and blame the 'Tiser, (and you know who in particular) for running an agenda on this issue. The club has left itself open to it through its actions.

Not in my circle of Adelaide FC supporters. Most thought the penalty had to be imposed to have consistency. Most neutral supporters (other clubs) are happy to have poor off field behaviour by players and turn a blind eye to it. Could give some prime examples of players' actions that were simply explained away , or fines given, so that the "stars" could still play but you know of many I am sure. To get a club culture that earns respect just look at the AFC.

 

[High Voltage]

Not in my circle of Adelaide FC supporters. Most thought the penalty had to be imposed to have consistency. Most neutral supporters (other clubs) are happy to have poor off field behaviour by players and turn a blind eye to it. Could give some prime examples of players' actions that were simply explained away , or fines given, so that the "stars" could still play but you know of many I am sure. To get a club culture that earns respect just look at the AFC.

I know its been done to death so I'll make this my last comment and let you finish it off. By your definition, the three players in question are defined as having "poor off-field behaviour" that deserved suspension.
I personally think that they were harshly dealt with. Penalise the players for an indiscretion, sure, but one that penalises their team, their coach, their members and their sponsors is way over the top (IMO only of course).

 

[Allefgib]

I was in Bad Boy Bubby.

haha.. I remember who you are now Kristof! (or rather what you do )