Baker flying bump

[maskmcgee]

Richmond fans were 100% for Peter Wrights ban, they can't object to this at all.

 

[Maddo11]

Richmond fans were 100% for Peter Wrights ban, they can't object to this at all.

Except the tribunal agreed that Wright never an attempt at the ball, and agrees that Butler did

 

[maskmcgee]

Except the tribunal agreed that Wright never an attempt at the ball, and agrees that Butler did

No, they made it clear if Essendon had challenged it they would of said he was contesting the ball.

 

[Freddy Swift]

No, they made it clear if Essendon had challenged it they would of said he was contesting the ball.

How could Essendon challenge when Wright pled guilty and agreed he was never marking the ball?

 

[maskmcgee]

Wright pled guilty and agreed he was never marking the ball?

He didn't Lawyers said the AFL's rules made it impossible to challenge so to plead guilty to whatever false claims the AFL was making for a lesser sentence. His plea had no relevance to anything other than limiting ban length.

 

[HairyO]

He didn't Lawyers said the AFL's rules made it impossible to challenge so to plead guilty to whatever false claims the AFL was making for a lesser sentence. His plea had no relevance to anything other than limiting ban length.

False claims? Would you says its a conspiracy ?