- Joined
- Dec 8, 2004
- Posts
- 22,755
- Reaction score
- 156
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Post Count: heaps
- Banned
- #51
mark73 said:I don't hold any grudges against hiphop "performers"(I won't say musicians) because it obviously sells to a particular market,but my gripe with it is that it all sounds pretty much the same,and I'm only talking now commercialised hiphop because I have never been a fan enough to get into it deeply...
There appears to be a lot of talentless clones in this field of music,and having watched a hip hop/rapper contest in the U.S,my opinion was confirmed.A couple of African/American judges who made little sense when describing who was better,which was not hard to understand,the performers clothing was all that told them apart...
Its riding on the quest of a wave at the minute,but with so many hits sounding the same and/or based on "rapping" over yesterdays hits (Will Smith was the king of it),it just doesn't do anything for me,as a musician...
you'll find many hiphop fans would agree with you re: the repetitiveness of commerciual hiphop.
But many muso's respect, for example a band called the roots who are undisputedly hiphop yet have some of the best muso's going round right now in their group.
It's like any genre - look at punk for example, if you only ever heard commercial punk music you could definitely apply the exact same comments to it as you did to hiphop.
imo commercial hiphop is rap. there is a difference.
Also, as a sidenote, it's interesting to remember that there are really ony 3 major hiphop labels in america, and only two music video companies. Basically the companies found the formula that sells and will stick to it. When there is such a monopoly on it, you'll see very little experimentation from the major labels.







