I'm using the derby in the sense of a two team town.Isn't Carlton v Essendon a form of derby with a rivalry going back to 1872 in a lose form and since 1878 from VFA days just like Port first played Norwood in the SAFA in 1878?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I'm using the derby in the sense of a two team town.Isn't Carlton v Essendon a form of derby with a rivalry going back to 1872 in a lose form and since 1878 from VFA days just like Port first played Norwood in the SAFA in 1878?
Cook book lol. Savage af
No option but to change username after that level of burn
Haha I just remembered
While we were preparing our entry into the AFL, Norwood were entering the groundbreaking realm of lycra guernseys
In the Western Australian Football League East Fremantle and South Fremantle had a great rivalry and derby. Those games at times were known as blood baths. Fremantle is the port of Perth and 20km from Perth very similar to Port Adelaide and Adelaide being 15km apart. You have Perth, East Perth and West Perth and their rivalry wasn't as big and the neither was any involving the other 3 clubs Claremont, Subiaco and Swan Districts. Peel came into the competition in 1997.
When the AFL gave Fremantle the sub licence in 1993 for the 1995 season, they and the Western Australian Football Commission (WAFC) asked both Fremantles if they wanted to make a bid for for the licence and the other clubs as well but they both said no as they knew they couldn't compete with the already established West Coast Eagles (WCE). Plus the biggest supporter base of a WAFL club was about 16% of the footy supporters when they did surveys. I think South Freo had the biggest following. The WAFC were given the licence and so they set up a generic Fremantle team to compete with the WCE and whilst they based the club at Fremantle and tried to get a few people from the 2 Fremantle local clubs, the rivalry was so great that they didnt put a lot of people from the 2 clubs together.
They tried to say they were the Fremantle people's team but Fremantle supporters were somewhat ostracized. In 2001 a supporter group called the Freo mob agitated and demonstrated for change for the WAFC to stop treating them as second class citizens, give power to the members and set up more Freo type people on the board and not just a generic WAFC representative types and a WCE-lite type club. Also an attempt was made to involve more South and East Freo people and ex players more into the structure of the club.
The Freo supporter base has evolved partly due to those changes and partly due to WCE selling out a relatively small stadium each game to its members, so if you wanted to watch AFL and weren't a WCE member, you had to go watch an initially poorly attended Fremantle game. Here is a bit of footage about the rivalry.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I didnt want to confuse the lad with all the Neesham Claremont influence.Freo were known derisively as the Claremont Dockers in their initial years because they sourced so many players/coaches/staff from that club (a bit like the Crows and Glenelg) With the South Freo vs East Freo rivalry being so intense it's highly unlikely that a combined bid for an AFL license would ever have materialised - imagine the likelihood of Port and Norwood making a combined bid!
It's just an old university login ID I used when i signed up here and at TPFP, and it's always been referred to as Cookie, Coob kool and cook book. Those that know me just call me CoopsCook book lol. Savage af
No option but to change username after that level of burn
A joint Port and Norwood team was discussed in 1982 as a potential composite team. I think that lasted for a few days before they both said no and then Max and Don Roach then went off to the VFL an made their presentation about a crows type composite team.With the South Freo vs East Freo rivalry being so intense it's highly unlikely that a combined bid for an AFL license would ever have materialised - imagine the likelihood of Port and Norwood making a combined bid!
Hindsight is a b*tch, but it seems that SANFL should have proposed a "merger" with VFL in late 70's/early 80's. By merger, I mean sending four to five clubs (Port, Norwood, Sturt, North, South?) to join a new AFL along all VFL teams; something like ABA and NBA or AFL and NFL in the US – a smaller, but successful league joining a bigger and stronger one.
Hindsight is a b*tch, but it seems that SANFL should have proposed a "merger" with VFL in late 70's/early 80's. By merger, I mean sending four to five clubs (Port, Norwood, Sturt, North, South?) to join a new AFL along all VFL teams; something like ABA and NBA or AFL and NFL in the US – a smaller, but successful league joining a bigger and stronger one.
Footscray changed their name to Western Bulldogs in 1996 at which time both West Coast and Freemantle were already playing in the AFL. Shows how Melbourne centric the AFL is in their thinking.A not too football interested mate thought that West Coast, Freo, and Western Bulldogs were all WA teams.
Sent from mTalk
Sez who. Sez you? Mr Negative No All Everything.
Trot off to your corner and work on your long threatened non existent questions re the China Strategy.
As you seem to hoard hanging-judge delusions re what should or shouldn't go into somebody elses's thread - a new friend no less from Brazil who is keen to learn the history of our Club and the competion it has broadly dominated - I would prefer for you to henceforth clam up and clock out.
You are out of luck. You got me on a very bad afternoon.
Well they won a premiership in the 50s, and one in the 40s*, and one in the 30s, and one in the 20s. Four in total in their entire history.Torrens were pretty strong in the 50s weren't they? I cannot ever recall meeting a Torrens supporter!
Footscray changed their name to Western Bulldogs in 1996 at which time both West Coast and Freemantle (and Adelaide and Geelong) were already playing in the AFL. Shows how Melbourne centric the AFL is in their thinking.
Not sent from mTalk
I don't think any of the existing SANFL clubs could realistically vie for a 3rd licence in their own right now. It's really hard to see a third team from Adelaide in the foreseeable future. However, if there's a significant enough increase in population over time you might get a situation where 2 could become 3 (perhaps if the Crows were disbanded and replaced by generic Northern and Southern Adelaide teams).Then, basically, Adelaide represents SANFL and Port represents itself in the AFL. A third SA team would need to come from scratch, and/or representing a part of Adelaide with strong local identity — if such a place actually exists. Otherwise, AFL cannot expand in SA.
Any league cronie with that much foresight and ambition would have got John Snowed.
View attachment 389591
A joint Port and Norwood team was discussed in 1982 as a potential composite team. I think that lasted for a few days before they both said no and then Max and Don Roach then went off to the VFL an made their presentation about a crows type composite team.
I don't think any of the existing SANFL clubs could realistically vie for a 3rd licence in their own right now. It's really hard to see a third team from Adelaide in the foreseeable future. However, if there's a significant enough increase in population over time you might get a situation where 2 could become 3 (perhaps if the Crows were disbanded and replaced by generic Northern and Southern Adelaide teams).
If Norwood pushed hard they could potentially do it. Push aggressively to get people to games and sell out Norwood Oval every week. Again, they got just under 40k to a SANFL grand final. They've got supporters. I'd wager a fair number of them would switch to support the club closer to home. I don't see a 3rd SA club because of population statistics and lack of local finances, even though it is Norwood and their coterie would be far richer than most clubs. The Crows won't disband, that's financial suicide for everyone in the state who's related to football (us included). No other existing club outside Norwood in the country has a snow's chance in hell though of getting in aside from Southport who should've been the 17th GC side from the start.
Who's Southport?
A club in the Gold Coast in QLD who are pretty much their version of us in state league terms. They have fairly big support for a club from that part of Australia, are well established and tried pushing to be the GC's AFL club before. They had 20,000 members at one stage and IIRC are the richest club outside the AFL. If they were admitted as Gold Coast then that shit factory wouldn't have most of the problems it does now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southport_Australian_Football_Club
Their list of players drafted into the VFL/AFL is pretty farken impressive. Ashcroft, Beams, Riewoldt, Tippet (Joel the superstar and his shitty brother Kurt), Rory Thompson, Sammy Gilbert and Lachie Weller are some of their products.
Edit*: Nathan Bock is their coach holy shit
Money and eyeballs. It is the 6th biggest city in Australia.Why did AFL choose Gold Coast? Because of Port?