Ben Brown

[tigs2010]

I was thinking more Hunt to Dusty, but sure, if you want to think that I'll let you.

Harsh

 

[telsor]

Harsh

Hey, I was being nice, letting you dream.

 

[tigs2010]

Hey, I was being nice, letting you dream.

Would love to hit dusty on the tit to win the game. Delicious

 

[pinetree]

Would love to hit dusty on the tit to win the game. Delicious

.

 

[tigs2010]

View attachment 401529 .

Why do you have my portrait? Wtf?

 

[Phar Ace]

Yes I do.

He would cost next to nothing. If anyone can improve him it would be Leppa.

He can play back as well as forward. He could pinch ruck.

If he makes us a better team and list yes I do.

What Hansen does that Brown doesn't is he allows us to get better players around him. He does not cost much so we can get a Bontempelli or Fyfe or a gun draft pick(s) that really improves our overall mix.

Also if Hansen does not play and our small forward line runs riot it does not cost us much unlike Brown who would be far more expensive!!!

If anything RFC playing like they do without Riewoldt enhances the viability of someone like Hansen who at minimum could offer more than a second ruck like Soldo at the moment. If for nothing else he would be very handy back up and a far superior option as another back up ruckman!!

The other thing is Hansen does not put anyone out. So no-one can say I am not going to get a game now because Hansen comes in. He would be the type of hybrid that could be effective for us because of his endurance in particular and if it helps our marking link play as well as assistance against taller forward lines when necessary he would be a very handy pick up IMO!

Hansen would improve our flexibility and it is our flexibility at the moment which is our strength because we have smaller players handy forward that defend and play on the ground as well as in the middle with speed that give us match up problems for other teams. Hansen would only add to the match up problems our overall mix would create for opposition teams!!

Arguably Hansen could make us a better team than Brown even if he did not play regularly!!

Sorry, what year have I morphed back to?

 

[pinetree]

Why do you have my portrait? Wtf?

If we win the granny this guy just has to go on stage and lift the trophy.

 

[pinetree]

Why do you have my portrait? Wtf?

Literally googled 'focus on footy moustache'...sure enough this babe popped up.

 

[partycorolla]

Yes I do.

He would cost next to nothing. If anyone can improve him it would be Leppa.

He can play back as well as forward. He could pinch ruck.

If he makes us a better team and list yes I do.

What Hansen does that Brown doesn't is he allows us to get better players around him. He does not cost much so we can get a Bontempelli or Fyfe or a gun draft pick(s) that really improves our overall mix.

Also if Hansen does not play and our small forward line runs riot it does not cost us much unlike Brown who would be far more expensive!!!

If anything RFC playing like they do without Riewoldt enhances the viability of someone like Hansen who at minimum could offer more than a second ruck like Soldo at the moment. If for nothing else he would be very handy back up and a far superior option as another back up ruckman!!

The other thing is Hansen does not put anyone out. So no-one can say I am not going to get a game now because Hansen comes in. He would be the type of hybrid that could be effective for us because of his endurance in particular and if it helps our marking link play as well as assistance against taller forward lines when necessary he would be a very handy pick up IMO!

Hansen would improve our flexibility and it is our flexibility at the moment which is our strength because we have smaller players handy forward that defend and play on the ground as well as in the middle with speed that give us match up problems for other teams. Hansen would only add to the match up problems our overall mix would create for opposition teams!!

Arguably Hansen could make us a better team than Brown even if he did not play regularly!!

What the actual f.uck?

 

[NaturalDisaster]

Yes I do.

He would cost next to nothing. If anyone can improve him it would be Leppa.

He can play back as well as forward. He could pinch ruck.

If he makes us a better team and list yes I do.

What Hansen does that Brown doesn't is he allows us to get better players around him. He does not cost much so we can get a Bontempelli or Fyfe or a gun draft pick(s) that really improves our overall mix.

Also if Hansen does not play and our small forward line runs riot it does not cost us much unlike Brown who would be far more expensive!!!

If anything RFC playing like they do without Riewoldt enhances the viability of someone like Hansen who at minimum could offer more than a second ruck like Soldo at the moment. If for nothing else he would be very handy back up and a far superior option as another back up ruckman!!

The other thing is Hansen does not put anyone out. So no-one can say I am not going to get a game now because Hansen comes in. He would be the type of hybrid that could be effective for us because of his endurance in particular and if it helps our marking link play as well as assistance against taller forward lines when necessary he would be a very handy pick up IMO!

Hansen would improve our flexibility and it is our flexibility at the moment which is our strength because we have smaller players handy forward that defend and play on the ground as well as in the middle with speed that give us match up problems for other teams. Hansen would only add to the match up problems our overall mix would create for opposition teams!!

Arguably Hansen could make us a better team than Brown even if he did not play regularly!!

Magics off his meds again

 

[telsor]

I'm not saying Snake_Baker and Mr Magic are the same person, but has anyone ever seen these two lunatics in the same room together?

You shouldn't be so quick to turn your nose up at this.

He would cost you nothing in trade, wouldn't be expensive, can play at either end, offers a "point of difference" that you need in your side, can pinch hit in the ruck, and is still only 28 years old.

The bloke averages over 6 marks a match throughout his career. No side will let him roam alone in a forward line and this in turn assists Riewoldt. He is definitely worth consideration.

Yes I do.

He would cost next to nothing. If anyone can improve him it would be Leppa.

He can play back as well as forward. He could pinch ruck.

If he makes us a better team and list yes I do.

What Hansen does that Brown doesn't is he allows us to get better players around him. He does not cost much so we can get a Bontempelli or Fyfe or a gun draft pick(s) that really improves our overall mix.

Also if Hansen does not play and our small forward line runs riot it does not cost us much unlike Brown who would be far more expensive!!!

If anything RFC playing like they do without Riewoldt enhances the viability of someone like Hansen who at minimum could offer more than a second ruck like Soldo at the moment. If for nothing else he would be very handy back up and a far superior option as another back up ruckman!!

The other thing is Hansen does not put anyone out. So no-one can say I am not going to get a game now because Hansen comes in. He would be the type of hybrid that could be effective for us because of his endurance in particular and if it helps our marking link play as well as assistance against taller forward lines when necessary he would be a very handy pick up IMO!

Hansen would improve our flexibility and it is our flexibility at the moment which is our strength because we have smaller players handy forward that defend and play on the ground as well as in the middle with speed that give us match up problems for other teams. Hansen would only add to the match up problems our overall mix would create for opposition teams!!

Arguably Hansen could make us a better team than Brown even if he did not play regularly!!

 

[SouthernStripes]

View attachment 401529 .

That dudes picture needs to appear way more on this site than it does.

 

[Ned_Flanders]

I would barrack for carlton if hansen came to.our club

Fmd....

 

[Tigerbob68]

That dudes picture needs to appear way more on this site than it does.

 

[Calcium Man]

I would barrack for carlton if hansen came to.our club

Fmd....

Haven't seen him linked to Essendon anywhere

 

[Achilles Heel]

I am happy for Tigers to ignore Ben Brown.

We got something organic going now.

Need to keep Dusty get best available. If anything more Dusty/caddy big mids that can play forward more than anything. Plus this type even through draft help us quicker in premierships for 2018/19etc...

 

[SouthernStripes]

View attachment 401765

That's better!

 

[pinetree]

That's better!

He has become an iconic (sex) symbol of positive change for RFC.

 

[Tiges1229]

View attachment 401529 .

Best

 

[THE THIN MAN]

I just realised Norf don't have any rivalries lol

 

[Horace]

I mentioned smoke and fire here the other day. Interesting that Ralph Carr was in Hobart to watch North a couple of weeks ago. And we know where BBB hails from. Many took a different take, but what a coincidence if you know what I mean.

 

["The Roar Is Back"]

Miles , Batchelor , Lennon
for
Brown and mid late picks .
If you haven't already heard of it , don't forget where you read it first.

 

[THE THIN MAN]

Miles , Batchelor , Lennon
for
Brown and mid late picks .
If you haven't already heard of it , don't forget where you read it first.