- Joined
- Oct 2, 2007
- Posts
- 912
- Reaction score
- 558
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- New York Knicks
In the article with wakes (posted by swanny36) did anyone else notice the last paragraph which he said
"It just reinforced to the whole group that we're not a club about individuals, we're a team. It was incredibly satisfying not having Didak, not having both the Shaws and Benny Johnson not playing, and seeing that no individual is stronger than the team."
I find it very odd that BJ was named in with the carcrashliars (ha-ha)... Just seemed a bit strange to me, as though he has an intra club suspension or something along the lines of that hasnt been shown to the media...
Maybe I'm just reading too much into it and Wakes was referring to the fact last few years he has been a part of the first 22 and is out but still the way I read it he put it down under the category of "no individual stronger than the team"
Thoughts anyone?
"It just reinforced to the whole group that we're not a club about individuals, we're a team. It was incredibly satisfying not having Didak, not having both the Shaws and Benny Johnson not playing, and seeing that no individual is stronger than the team."
I find it very odd that BJ was named in with the carcrashliars (ha-ha)... Just seemed a bit strange to me, as though he has an intra club suspension or something along the lines of that hasnt been shown to the media...
Maybe I'm just reading too much into it and Wakes was referring to the fact last few years he has been a part of the first 22 and is out but still the way I read it he put it down under the category of "no individual stronger than the team"
Thoughts anyone?



