Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
That's incredible! This needs to happen.ill just leave this here
![]()
![]()
ill just leave this here
![]()
![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Footy results don't = commercial success.GWS' lack of bargaining power? 1 game away from the GF this year and premiership favourites in 2017, they have a lot of bargaining power and companies will want to be with them.
Majestic make the BBL kits.Are you sure that BLK has the BBL?
I've only seen ISC in Australia?
BLK had a global footprint didn't they?
ISC don't supply lots of teams outside AFL and NRLInteeerrrrresting.
With ISC taking on so many clubs, isn't this the exact issue that BLK had...?
You really have to question if St Kilda even bothered to canvass the clubs with existing contracts before signing on with BLK, if they signed up knowing this then the people involved should be moved on and if they didn't know they should still be moved on.The tele saying this today:
Cash strapped Brisbane Lions are still owed about $10,000 from 2016’s deal with BLK and must find a sponsor to replace the $150,000 in cash as well as the playing, training gear and merchandise owed for 2017.
The Suns’ have been paid for 2016 but are waiting on training gear and playing strips and have a two-year $400,000 deal at stake.
Both clubs said they had been canvassed by several companies looking to replace BLK and were hopeful 2017’s bottom line would not be affected.
BLK are the major sponsor of the QAFL competition and also sponsor AFL Queensland’s Q Schools Cup.
You really have to question if St Kilda even bothered to canvass the clubs with existing contracts before signing on with BLK, if they signed up knowing this then the people involved should be moved on and if they didn't know they should still be moved on.
It's almost like they saw the $$$ on the offer and then didn't bother to look at anything else. This isn't like Geelong and COAR where it's completely new albeit backed by Cotton On this is a company that has been around for a while and has a history you can check particularity when as far as anyone knows the Saints motivation was monetary. What good is a better deal on paper if the fulfilment of it is erratic?The article confirmed later on what we have been talking is true, wrg has been under the pump much of the year, with industry concern when staff were asked to take big pay cuts.
Makes the saints decision def poor
Trying to cover up their own incompetence.It does seem that the saints are going to wear BLK in 2017. I find that odd. Unless it's nothing more than short term damage control