Remove this Banner Ad

Club Mgmt. Board of Directors as led by President Dave Barham - Statement from Barham addressing Merrett etc - 12/9

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
 
Last edited:
i cant imagine 4 goes anywhere, and the only way F1 moves is to split it and give us more picks.But really we need to be cautious with that one.

Maybe there's some exits that help facilitate.

Sorry, should have been more specific - I don’t think we’ll get involved of the trading of players. I think we’ll go heavy in the draft and that’ll be it
 
No there is a review, they have to put together a sub-committee and that committee then sets terms of reference and hires the external people that then come and do the job. We should get terms of reference/sub-committee info this week.

And if the review finds that Barham should step down then he will.
Did he actually commit to that? The results of the external review would be reviewed themselves I would think, before the members are allowed to read what they are allowed to. Have they commited to publishing the findings in full?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad



When the external review comes back in the coming days…

Am I hearing that right?

If so it fits with my assumption all along - there is no review.

Wouldn't mind seeing BJ involved in the club again in some capacity. I think there's enough distance from the old timers for him not to be dragged into old boys' crap, and he's a strong personality who you know will drive high expectations and standards.
 
Did he actually commit to that? The results of the external review would be reviewed themselves I would think, before the members are allowed to read what they are allowed to. Have they commited to publishing the findings in full?
Goddard said Barham would step down if the review recommended it, in the clip that we were discussing - sounded like Barham told him so, or that he heard on the grapevine or something.
 
Did he actually commit to that? The results of the external review would be reviewed themselves I would think, before the members are allowed to read what they are allowed to. Have they commited to publishing the findings in full?
I'd imagine that some elements of a footy department review you wouldn't want the competition to have access to. So I'm sure that will be the reason they give us a highly edited version.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

No, but it was largely his own doing. I love Hird, but it’s not like he came into the environment, it was under his watch.


It wasn't his doing.

It's also not relevant to how he'd coach next year.

To the extent you're saying he should have stepped down earlier, it's still not relevant to how he will coach next year.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Essendon dinner update, pls. Thx.
Don’t think we’ll get one, it’s just a run of the mill coterie dinner with a big price tag.

But it’s interesting who was there — Little for one.

Can be sure they’re all talking about it and there will be people trying to influence outcomes and using that as a networking opportunity too.
 
Do we reckon the media would look more favourably on us in the current circumstances or if we had won over Clarko and then just gave him a blank canvas to bring in whoever he wanted?

Process v no process
Turmoil v no turmoil
Status quo v all change

I actually prefer this timeline
 
Do we reckon the media would look more favourably on us in the current circumstances or if we had won over Clarko and then just gave him a blank canvas to bring in whoever he wanted?

Process v no process
Turmoil v no turmoil
Status quo v all change

I actually prefer this timeline
other than not removing rutten first, im fine with where things are at

club is overdue a transformation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top