Remove this Banner Ad

Club Mgmt. Board of Directors as led by President Dave Barham - Statement from Barham addressing Merrett etc - 12/9

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
 
Last edited:
Who the f voted for Sheedy, seriously…
Something about the direction of the tent in relation to the trajectory of your proverbial?
Just keep him distracted with sports nights reliving past glories with hirdy so neither gets any ideas of getting their hands dirty
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I don’t want him on the board, but there’s also a maximum term for directors and once he’s hit the maximum he can’t stand for election nor can he be appointed to a vacancy. He also can’t lead an alternate ticket.
You can serve a max of three terms.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Absolutely shameful that the club won't commit to getting out of pokies entirely even if alternative revenue streams are established.
Just to be clear; I detest pokies and gambling in general.

However, the entire league is propped up by sports betting companies. I genuinely don't see the argument in releasing an income stream that we own and control when funds from the AFL come in the form of bonus bets ...

I also find it suspicious that there seems to be a push only against this form of gambling ... Is it because the clubs own the licences themselves without any AFL oversight required or approval granted?
 
I also find it suspicious that there seems to be a push only against this form of gambling ... Is it because the clubs own the licences themselves without any AFL oversight required or approval granted?

Not really, pokies are a very visible, harmful form of gambling.

There's no skill, the machines are simply programmed to repay a percentage of every dollar put in over time. They usually harm those who can least afford it, and are pretty highly correlated with family violence incidents.


The correlation is strongest in Melton, which has the highest concentration of AFL machines in Victoria, and where the increase in family violence incidents between 2013-2017 was a staggering 35 per cent.

Guess where Essendon operates ~ half their pokie machines?


Melton City councillors voted 8-0 in favour of allowing the Bombers to continue operations at the Melton Country Club on Monday night – home to 90 poker machines.

With the existing lease not due to expire until February 2022, the new agreement takes the licence up until 2047.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Yeah it's a misleading headline (and a pretty poor analysis); a correlation is not a 'link'. Reminds me of the study done in the US which demonstrated a link between an increase in ice-cream sales and an increase in homicides. Spoiler alert, ice cream doesn't make people kill each other - but both ice cream and murder are more prevalent during heat waves. I dare say the common denominator here is 'low socio-economic area' which statistically is more likely to have higher rates of pokies usage and family violence.

The strong and growing opposition to AFL clubs owning pokie machines is a little odd, considering the AFL is bombarding children with sports betting ads all through their coverage and website/social media, supporting those companies very deliberate mission to poison young people's brains to associate sports with gambling and become life-long gamblers.

The damage of pokies is very visible given people are physically present sitting at machines, whereas sports gamblers are at home on the couch or at the pub with their mates pouring their money down the toilet through an app on their phone. Might also be a view that pokies target those in the lowest socio-economic areas whereas sports gambling is a bit more 'middle class', but I don't know that one is more damaging than another.

Personally I think it's pretty gross for professional sporting clubs and leagues to use and promote gambling to generate profits. Absolutely undercuts any claims of supporting communities or caring about society.
 
Yeah it's a misleading headline (and a pretty poor analysis); a correlation is not a 'link'. Reminds me of the study done in the US which demonstrated a link between an increase in ice-cream sales and an increase in homicides. Spoiler alert, ice cream doesn't make people kill each other - but both ice cream and murder are more prevalent during heat waves. I dare say the common denominator here is 'low socio-economic area' which statistically is more likely to have higher rates of pokies usage and family violence.

The strong and growing opposition to AFL clubs owning pokie machines is a little odd, considering the AFL is bombarding children with sports betting ads all through their coverage and website/social media, supporting those companies very deliberate mission to poison young people's brains to associate sports with gambling and become life-long gamblers.

The damage of pokies is very visible given people are physically present sitting at machines, whereas sports gamblers are at home on the couch or at the pub with their mates pouring their money down the toilet through an app on their phone. Might also be a view that pokies target those in the lowest socio-economic areas whereas sports gambling is a bit more 'middle class', but I don't know that one is more damaging than another.

Personally I think it's pretty gross for professional sporting clubs and leagues to use and promote gambling to generate profits. Absolutely undercuts any claims of supporting communities or caring about society.

A correlation can be a link.

Number of goals scored would be highly correlated with winning football games for example.

Gambling losses is pretty well known to cause harmful outcomes, financial pressures is pretty well known to cause financial outcomes, therefore pokies usage resulting in harmful outcomes is probably not an entirely unrelated correlation.

And yes, sports betting should also be a target and far better regulated than it is.
 
Not really, pokies are a very visible, harmful form of gambling.

There's no skill, the machines are simply programmed to repay a percentage of every dollar put in over time. They usually harm those who can least afford it, and are pretty highly correlated with family violence incidents.




Guess where Essendon operates ~ half their pokie machines?

Are we then looking to ban alcohol which causes just as much family violence and public violence and injury?

On top of that footy clubs getting out of them is not solving the issues . All it is doing is making the clubs look warm and fuzzy. Not like the machines go. Someone else just runs them.
In all honesty the racing clubs should be the venues with pokies given they are a gambling industry .

I have no issues with poker machines going. Do not play them and if they went so be it . I fully understand the issues but t is a double edged sword as these clubs do provide a crap load of revenue to the government and employment as well.
 
Not really, pokies are a very visible, harmful form of gambling.

There's no skill, the machines are simply programmed to repay a percentage of every dollar put in over time. They usually harm those who can least afford it, and are pretty highly correlated with family violence incidents.




Guess where Essendon operates ~ half their pokie machines?

Agree with almost everything you said. However, sports betting is arguably far more visible and accessible in this day and age.

There is no skill involved in sports betting. The gambling companies are infecting the entire sporting landscape of the nation and everyone is in on the con.

Us letting go of the pokies will only cut off a revenue stream in order to get a little puff piece in the paper.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top