Thank God it's 2004 not 1994. Otherwise he would have been just as sensitive an appointment as the club's most recent interim CEO. Hands up who remembers who that was.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Thank God it's 2004 not 1994. Otherwise he would have been just as sensitive an appointment as the club's most recent interim CEO. Hands up who remembers who that was.
He also called himself a "great" moderator but is frustrated that he has to mod more than 1 board.

Thank God it's 2004 not 1994. Otherwise he would have been just as sensitive an appointment as the club's most recent interim CEO. Hands up who remembers who that was.
apart from salary cap issues, I thought we have plenty of cash reserves that could be used to attract the right person.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Anyone using the phrase "we will not survive" is exaggerating. As humbling it may be, the AFL will never let one of its 'frontier' clubs go under after spending so much money setting up two new ones. It'll cancel out all its work put into shoring up the television rights negotiations.
Anyone using the phrase "we will not survive" is exaggerating. As humbling it may be, the AFL will never let one of its 'frontier' clubs go under after spending so much money setting up two new ones. It'll cancel out all its work put into shoring up the television rights negotiations.
Sometimes you've got to spend money to make money. The CEO position would be an example of this one would think. Pay for a better person, get better results. In theory.

Absolutely NOT. The agreement is for seven games in Victoria. Not 5, not 6. I repeat the agreement is for SEVEN and the club should never have moved from this position.
Is that not the theory politicians use to justify their snouts in the trough?
Facetious comment. We should pay the market value for a good CEO. THe last one proved what damage the wrong choice can achieve.
Absolutely NOT. The agreement is for seven games in Victoria. Not 5, not 6. I repeat the agreement is for SEVEN and the club should never have moved from this position.
Wow you are the CEO for 9 years and the very best they can say is that you have “been an asset to the club”.
I don't think facetious is the right description for my statement at all. I'm not being humorous or flippant.
"Market value for a good CEO" and "pay for a better person, get better results" are not mutually exclusive ideas. Simply saying that comments of tightening up the purse strings while pursuing a new CEO might not be a brilliant idea. We want someone talented who can help turn the club around - you don't get that by offering a pittance.
Sorry Nige, miscommunication. My comment was facetious, not yours. Read the rest of what I said. Basic economics -pay peanuts, get monkey. And that is not what we need now.



Interesting to read in the Courier Mail today that the Brisbane Roar have taken Bowers on as a strategic planning consultant, and there are even rumours he may be being groomed to be their next CEO.![]()
![]()
Good luck to them.![]()
It constantly astounds me how CEO's are so often re-employed despite their previous performance. Even Sol Trujillo managed to get a cushy gig.


Interesting to read in the Courier Mail today that the Brisbane Roar have taken Bowers on as a strategic planning consultant, and there are even rumours he may be being groomed to be their next CEO.![]()
![]()
Good luck to them.![]()
"THE ROAR"
I see an excellent opportunity for a new logo. Any suggestions? Anyone?