Remove this Banner Ad

Brad Crouch versus Tom Mitchell

  • Thread starter Thread starter WWSD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Which player will be better in the future?

  • Brad Crouch

    Votes: 47 48.0%
  • Tom Mitchell

    Votes: 51 52.0%

  • Total voters
    98

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Both players have had exceptional seasons so far for their respective Clubs and both players look to be future A Grade players of the competition. It's tough to split them at this early stage, who in your opinion though will be the better player once they reach their peak?

Player Statistics Comparison

Brad Crouch Name Tom Mitchell
Adelaide Crows Team Sydney Swans
9 Career Games 8
2013 Stats for Season 2013
9 Games 8
11.1 Kicks Per Game 12.0
11.9 Handballs Per Game 10.4
23.0 Disposals Per Game 22.4
4.1 Marks Per Game 3.6
0.2 Goals Per Game 1.2
0.2 Behinds Per Game 1.5
4.2 Tackles Per Game 6.2
2.8 Inside 50s Per Game 3.1
0.3 Goal Assists Per Game 0.9
0.6 Frees For Per Game 1.8
0.6 Frees Against Per Game 0.5
7.4 Contested Possessions Per Game 9.4
15.6 Uncontested Possessions Per Game 12.6
16.6 Effective Disposals Per Game 15.2
72.2% Effective Disposals % Per Game 67.9%
1.8 Clangers Per Game 2.1
0.3 Contested Marks Per Game 0.1
0.1 Marks Inside 50 Per Game 0.8
2.9 Clearances Per Game 1.9
1.1 Rebound 50s Per Game1.4
 
Can I please have both?
In all seriousness, they play different roles and are VERY VERY close on ability.
Leaning towards Crouch, but either.

Went with Mitchell but pretty much this. Both will be stars of the league for the next decade.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

One team would prefer Crouch. The other 17 clubs aren't Adelaide.

So even though hes being outvoted? All 11 votes must be Adelaide supporters.
Idiot! I think you'll find many neutrals would take Crouch too.
 
Mitchell doesn't get much of a run on the ball racks up a lot of touches on the forward flank
 
So even though hes being outvoted? All 11 votes must be Adelaide supporters.
Idiot! I think you'll find many neutrals would take Crouch too.

The other 17 clubs. I doubt those 11 people are club officials.

You're pretty quick to throw insults around for someone who doesn't even read a post properly.

Really hard to believe you're trying to use a Big Footy poll to strengthen your argument.
 
Sydney obviously love Mitchell and rate him highly due to his history at the club. He's a good honest battler that tackles well but isn't flashy. Crouch for mine has the greater potential and is performing slightly better in a worse team.
 
What I like most about Mitchell, is he's playing mostly in the forward pocket every week with usually 1 quarter a game in the middlea and he's still racking up big numbers. Not only that, but he's led or been close to topping score involvements every game since he's been in the side.
 
The stats are all pretty even but Mitchell destroys Crouch in goals. For that reason right now I'd take him. Midfielders who can hit the scoreboard are very valuable.


Do honest battlers that tackle well but are not flashy kick many goals?:confused:
 
Sydney obviously love Mitchell and rate him highly due to his history at the club. He's a good honest battler that tackles well but isn't flashy. Crouch for mine has the greater potential and is performing slightly better in a worse team.


We rate him highly because of what he has done since his first game starting as a sub (coming back from years of injuries), not because of who his dad is.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The stats are all pretty even but Mitchell destroys Crouch in goals. For that reason right now I'd take him. Midfielders who can hit the scoreboard are very valuable.

He's playing half forward and we've only seen what Crouch can do the last month.
Maybe watch some football?
 
Crouch's increased midfield minutes are somewhat offset by Mitchell being in the better side and Sydney's game plan suiting him with their emphasise on contested ball and stoppages.

Still have to take Mitchell, but it's close.
 
Both good inside players. Rate Crouch higher out of the two. This round has shown how Crouch has gone past Mitchell atm. At the end of their career who knows. Any awesome talent is one serious injury away from not having a career.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Cant split them. Both are absolute quality.
Already said in another thread, but crouchy was probably the crows best player today.
Ridiculous to say that Crouch has gone past Mitchell.
 
It is hard to split them. Hard to compare Mitchell this round, he is received a tag and he has not even played 10 games. I think Crouch is cleaner with the ball but Mitchell can damage the scoreboard more (though assists as well).


Stupid decision by the Dogs:confused:, meant that Kieren Jack absolutely destroyed them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom