- Joined
- Sep 29, 2004
- Posts
- 25,366
- Reaction score
- 18,626
- Location
- Merimbula
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Bengals
Which in itself is bullshit.Nah, they had to do it for perception purposes as a minimum.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Soccer Notice Image
Champions League - FINAL - PSG v Arsenal ⚽ Europa Semis ⚽ 2026 FIFA Series A - Socceroos friendlies ⚽ The Matildas x 2026 Womens Asia Cup ⚽ Conference League - SEMIS! ⚽ Conference League - Rd of 16 ⚽ Socceroos Internat'l Friendlies ⚽ FA Cup - Man City Win
Which in itself is bullshit.Nah, they had to do it for perception purposes as a minimum.
They shouldn't. Pathetic "case" they presented.Every chance.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Don't think there's an appeal provision for "inadequate counsel", that would be their only valid grounds.They shouldn't. Pathetic "case" they presented.

with exception to perhaps the carlton thread, that’s chock full of goodnessExcluding a Grand Final don't think I have ever seen a thread that has united us all.
Go Pies!
honestly deserved its own thread from the get go but ah wellMods - declare this a legendary thread - NOW![]()
Yes but that’s about losers and this is about winners.with exception to perhaps the carlton thread, that’s chock full of goodness
Yep, let's prosecute a case that we know will fail because it makes us look good.Nah, they had to do it for perception purposes as a minimum.
I’d like to take this opportunity to thank The Royal Sampler for his submissions in this case.
Nailed it from the get go.
P.s. I’ll take the thanks for suggesting we needed expert evidence from a biomechanic [emoji14]
Reasoning behind the verdict.






I’ve seen it before when a player is treated like this. And not just for our team.The bolded not true at all mate.

