Broughton as a forward

[Fat Nyfe]

Interested to hear peoples thoughts on this. Obviously not getting it quite as much, but he kicked 2 goals today and 2 last week. I think it's worth giving a chance, but we might need him in other areas of deficiency. He'll probably end up a bit of a swing player, given he's proven himself with great games in both midfield and defense too.

 

[IAMJUNGLEMUFFIN]

Not good for my DT, not good at all.

 

[BeinPurplenGreen]

Worked well against Essendon. We needed him down back or in the midfield today, especially once Pitt came on as sub. Hope he is back down back next week.

 

[Purple_ppl_eata]

He's done ok down there, provided us with a good target last week. Nothing wrong with adding an extra string to your bow, hopefully Ross doesn't pigeonhole him down there all the time, as he has proven to be very good in the midfield and down back so can switch when we need him to.

 

[Rob]

Been reasonable to date, particularly seeing as though our forward line has been functioning well in the 2 weeks he's been there. But our midfield was massacred today and was pretty ordinary last week, perhaps that's partly because of no Broughton. We are clearly lacking accountability in the clinches.

Still be happy to see him continue up forward though. He should get more and better quality supply in the next 4 weeks.

 

[Freo_4eva]

Not good for my DT, not good at all.

This... but the two weeks he's been there we have looked far better up forward.. kind of the "Jack Anthony" role, but getting it more

 

[Nickos66]

I like his cameo appearances up there. As long as the backline is holding up okay though.