I'm concerned McDevitt has been prosecuting cases for 30 years as he said. When he said we don't know what the players were administered he basically said we have no evidence. Laughable.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can someone clarify for me, why exactly was AOD not pursued again?
Need to settle an argument with a Collingwood flog who's using the fact Jobe "admitted" to cheating is proof of our guilt
it's not clear, there are a few schools of thought. The prevailing one is that ASADA gave faulty information to EFC and other parties. However whilst I think that's a factor, I also think the S0 loophole of using a compounding chemist had legs
Haha. Love it.
I hope the gate has been fixed.Looking forward tonight to The Footy Show work apprentice kid interviewing Dank at the front gate of his place with a handful of groceries.
So that declares theyve got and had squat all along.He just seriously said he will only have new evidence for an appeal if Dank listens to me and releases something.
At the end of the day, I blame ASADA for not making it clear exactly why they decided not to proceed with the AOD prosecution.it's not clear, there are a few schools of thought. The prevailing one is that ASADA gave faulty information to EFC and other parties. However whilst I think that's a factor, I also think the S0 loophole of using a compounding chemist had legs
So that declares theyve got and had squat all along.
We're officially in the clear with that comment.
So that declares theyve got and had squat all along.
We're officially in the clear with that comment.
I am not 100% confident of NO appeal from ASADA. BM is a dick and I expect him to lose his job over this.