Remove this Banner Ad

Changes for Round 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter C-Dog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

C-Dog

Club Legend
Joined
May 7, 2007
Posts
1,673
Reaction score
153
AFL Club
Richmond
OUT: Edwards

IN: Not McMahon.

Nahas deserves another crack at it, that being said we could do with another solid body and edwards was terrible today in my opinion.
Any update on Adam Thomson? I'd like to see him in there
 
You have to reward form so it's so hard at the moment to make an accurate prediction. Coughlan, Connors, Thomson, Thursfield, Collins, Hughes, Pattison and even Cotchin in the next few rounds could come in. Some are unfit and some coming off injury.

Certain to be dropped: King, Edwards
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

At this stage I would be tempted to go with no changes this week, Wallace spoke about giving players who were prepared to have a go and be competitive would be given games. Based on today I can't recall anyone backing down when it was there turn to put it on the line. I know some people are getting stuck into Edwards for the clash with Milburn but watch it again its not like he shirked the contest, he went for the ball but came off second best. Its a lot better effort than some others try to pass off as putting your head over it.
 
OUT: Edwards

IN: Not McMahon.

Nahas deserves another crack at it, that being said we could do with another solid body and edwards was terrible today in my opinion.
Any update on Adam Thomson? I'd like to see him in there

50/50 on him, had some nice chances to get a break and slot a goal and seemed to make a nasty habit of ****ing the whole thing up, was hammered first 3 times he got it...spent a mark before he erant it and then tried to be a smart ass with his shot on goal and buggered that up to...perhaps another game...although Id favour dropping him for collins
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Out: Edwards Nahas

In: Tambling Thomson

Schulz also would be lucky to hold his spot.

But in the positives Polo played very well

Rance did very well i thought. Graham did better than i would of expected and Hislop definitely has the c*(t we need.

Deledio played well after a slow start.

McGuane is looking very good - i hoestly thought he was #3 behind Moore and Thursy but he is out best key defensive option.

Richo - un beliveable - when is he going to get maarried and start squezzing out some pups for us. We need some father sons. If he would of had a son at age 18 he could of played with his own son.

Bowden and Simmonds are on there last legs. browny has another year after this left. Time for succession plan.
 
Out: Edwards Nahas

In: Tambling Thomson

Schulz also would be lucky to hold his spot.

But in the positives Polo played very well

Rance did very well i thought. Graham did better than i would of expected and Hislop definitely has the c*(t we need.

Deledio played well after a slow start.

McGuane is looking very good - i hoestly thought he was #3 behind Moore and Thursy but he is out best key defensive option.

Richo - un beliveable - when is he going to get maarried and start squezzing out some pups for us. We need some father sons. If he would of had a son at age 18 he could of played with his own son.

Bowden and Simmonds are on there last legs. browny has another year after this left. Time for succession plan.

JB did enough (howzat Goal:thumbsu:), simmo was ordinary, did he take a mark:confused:
 
We might go in unchanged. But if there are any changes
Out: Edwards- Was not overly bad but was thrown around by the cats.
King?- Did some nice things but cost us 3-4 goals. Don't know maybe keep him in for one more week.

In: Connors(If fit) Collins
 
Why is everyone bagging King.
Played well i thought and should stay in this week.
Don't think anyone saw this but sarge played pretty good. He chased hard all the time, provided a target, and has the big body who put a few people on their asses when they tried to shepard him. Only thing wrong was his goalkicking but Riewolt is the same as well. Really we needed Shultzy in our team if he strings a acceptable performance like today.

Nahas and Edwards will probably be the two who may considered to be dropped.
Gus was a little sloppy but got a few disposals and did better than Browne, he'll stay in.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

OUT: Schulz(Can't kick for goal, took a great mark, ****ed the kick, need someone who can kick straight for goal if they aren't getting a lot of the ball), King(Too small, too erratic, simply not good enough), Edwards(2 poor games, either play him up forward, or don't play him at all right now).

IN: Hughes(Give him a go, can kick, would've relished the delivery for a lot of today, especially against the poor defence that Geelong had), Thomson(Depends on fitness)/Connors(Depends on fitness), Collins(PLEASE GIVE HIM A GO!), Thursfield(Still think he is in our 22, if Connors and Thomson aren't fit, give Thursty a go), Tambling(Just a maybe, don't know if he deserves a spot).
 
Edwards should sit out for the rest of the year. Needs to bulk up. Gets beaten one on one. When he does win a contest his disposal is errant; we can't carry players like that in the team. He either bulks up and puts his head over the ball or improves his disposal.
Let him play and domiate for Coburg in 2010. Regardless, he is a liabilty for the RFC for 2009. As for 2010, it is up to him. Tambling/Thomson in for him next week.
 
out: nahas king edwards
in: cleavage connors and collins or thomson
 
Out: Edwards, Nahas, King
In: Thomson, Connors, Collins (Coggas if fit)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom