- Banned
- #26
Be honest.I honestly don't think McInnes will make it tbh.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Carlton v Geelong - Rd 12 - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Cats at 69% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 12 Games
Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 12
SuperCoach Rd 12 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC - 2026 Fight MND Comp ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 12 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Capt/VC
Be honest.I honestly don't think McInnes will make it tbh.
Would McGovern play forward?Yeh me too....I'd like to see
Out - McGinnity, McInnes
In - Nelson, Barrass
Ideally, it won't happen though, McGovern has been too good down there and the mc probably think we're in with a chance to win. I'd even think about going with a short forward line, with Kennedy, resting ruckman and Hill playing as a lead-up forward.Would McGovern play forward?
Hmmm...Ideally, it won't happen though, McGovern has been too good down there and the mc probably think we're in with a chance to win. I'd even think about going with a short forward line, with Kennedy, resting ruckman and Hill playing as a lead-up forward.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yes I agree more likely, but the last time Hill was really relevant was when Josh Kennedy was out in 2012 and we played with a short forward line with Darling as the main target. It worked reasonably well then.Hmmm...
More likely we pick McInnes again.
Sinclair hasn't won me over yet - he took one really good mark tonight but to me he looks really immobile at times
I'd rest Yeo too for good measure.Out - Duggan (rested)
Why not? I'd suggest bringing Lycett in for one of them, that 3 ruckmen thing always works well for us.I'd rest Yeo too for good measure.
Sinclair hasn't won me over yet - he took one really good mark tonight but to me he looks really immobile at times
Is LeCras injured? Why was he subbed?
Simpson said Hill benefitted from having McInnes and he felt the balance of talls was right.
Whether that's the case for Port as well I'm not sure, but I'd like to see McInnes given another go - what have we got to lose really?
Nah he didn't get 50 possessions and he is an inside player, all of a sudden we have thousands of those.![]()

- Josh Hill has gone well - but also Fraser's input - we've learned not to play Josh as a tall. He's better off playing hybrid and having another tall down there.

We will trade him before we would delist himI honestly don't think McInnes will make it tbh. I know he should and will be given time to get up to speed but can't see him being anything more than a fringe player/delistee.
The game…Simpson said Hill benefitted from having McInnes and he felt the balance of talls was right.
Whether that's the case for Port as well I'm not sure, but I'd like to see McInnes given another go - what have we got to lose really?
He's probably an inside mid in his plans. He wouldn't cut it as an outside mid at AFL level and Simpson sees his major role in the team as an inside mid. If he's not capable of playing that role yet then that explains the lack of selection.I know lol. I was referring to Simpsons presser where he said college was an inside player and he was not playing because of this.
Does Simpson actually know his own players?
It's a big if but if we win this we have a pretty good few weeks playing saintkilda, Gold Coast and then Geelong at home.
