Remove this Banner Ad

Changes Vs Adelaide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Radz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Have collins or casserly proved themself yet to be good enough?

The others are good though
 
Outs: White Hyde Johnson Riewoldt
Ins: McGuane Jackson Morton Polo

Not to bad but hopefully we don't go back to the old selection process of dropping younger players to quickly when there making there way. With this in mind I reckon White and Reiwoldt must stay. Johnson is obviously out so you would expect Jackson or Polo to replace, Morton I think adds a lot to our forward line but for some reason was replaced by Pettifer how has done enough to keep his spot. Polak looks a chance to return, for who ?? as Schultz, Reiwoldt and certainly Moore should remain and I beleive it fair logic to rest, drop , McMahon who has been on knifes edge all year and replace him with a younger player , Connors , Casserly , Rance onto the half back line or maybe even Morton off half back.
Despite Edwards form last week against the Bumbers I reckon he might need to make way for someone else to be tried, form depending.
Most likely changes I beleive are :

Johnson - Jackson

Changes which should be made :

Johnson - Polo
Hyde - Jackson
Edwards - Morton
MCMahon - Polak/Connors/Casserly or Rance.

Would not be surprised if Tuck is carrying an injury and may be rested in next few weeks are goes to the half back line ??
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

WHAT I would like to see.

IN: Polak (for Pattison), Morton (for Pettifer), Connors (for Johnson), McGuane (for Hyde)/or possibly Polo (for Hyde).

What we are likely to see:

IN: Polak, Morton and Connors.
OUT: Johnson (inj), Hyde, Pattison.
 
WHAT I would like to see.

IN: Polak (for Pattison), Morton (for Pettifer), Connors (for Johnson), McGuane (for Hyde)/or possibly Polo (for Hyde).

What we are likely to see:

IN: Polak, Morton and Connors.
OUT: Johnson (inj), Hyde, Pattison.

Hyde has to stay with Johnson out or its Polo or Jackson. Need the extra tagger, probably for Goodwin and Conners isnt up to that role yet and Hyde also fits with the left footer. Love to see McGuane back but cant see an exact spot. Polak for Patto and Morton for Pettifer I agree also. I suspect Tivendale will get the other guernsey but maybe Collins has his chance. Just how they see the match ups I guess.
 
WHAT I would like to see.

IN: Polak (for Pattison), Morton (for Pettifer), Connors (for Johnson), McGuane (for Hyde)/or possibly Polo (for Hyde).

What we are likely to see:

IN: Polak, Morton and Connors.
OUT: Johnson (inj), Hyde, Pattison.

Hyde has to stay with Johnson out or its Polo or Jackson. Need the extra tagger, probably for Goodwin and Conners isnt up to that role yet and Hyde also fits with the left footer. Love to see McGuane back but cant see an exact spot. Polak for Patto and Morton for Pettifer I agree also. Tivendale has been bashing the door down but he hasnt been preferred yet so maybe a sign Just how they see the match ups I guess.
 
No need to play any tags against the Crows I don't reckon. Maybe one on to start on Thompson who has been in good form all year but Goodwin has been playing mainy foward, so I think Moorey should go with him. At this stage I would prefer Tuck or even Polo or Jacko to get the run with job ahead of Hyde who has been mauled the last couple of weeks. I wouldn't be suprised if Hyde get's one more go though
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom