TradeDraft
Post-Human
I dont Swan wouldn't be much help to the forward line. If he was fit he'd be
Playing midfield.
I think the Plan at Start of the Season was him Playing Forward and a Few Midfield Minutes
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I dont Swan wouldn't be much help to the forward line. If he was fit he'd be
Playing midfield.
He would be much help TO the fwd line regardless where he plays. And spend significant time IN the fwd line. Semantics aside, a loss not to be underestimated .I dont Swan wouldn't be much help to the forward line. If he was fit he'd be
Playing midfield.
How they contribute is the question. It's not only how many but who, where they play and how many games they miss. Also have to look at the combination of players missing. Comparing clubs in terms of injury lists is a problem because the above factors impact teams in different ways.they are a contributing factor for EVERY team. It's silly to argue otherwise.
Swan biggest loss for us this seasonHow they contribute is the question. It's not only how many but who, where they play and how many games they miss. Also have to look at the combination of players missing. Comparing clubs in terms of injury lists is a problem because the above factors impact teams in different ways.
Any side that suffers many injuries is bucketing water out of a leaky boat.
In how many ways does Swan's injury impact on the team?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Oh ffs... Well done Captain obvious! Yes we would be a better team if we didn't have any injuries to best 22 players.!! brilliant deduction there. Never occurred to me. What you can't seem to grasp for some bizarre reason is that every other team would also be a better side if they had no injuries to their best 22 players. But they do.. and we do.. so it's a nil factor (read excuse) unless there is something unusually bad about our injury list... and at the moment there isn't. Is this starting to make sense to you yet? What part of that don't you understand consistently?.. , month after month, year after year?
When the F$ck does this little fantasy of yours ever happen in reality that AFL teams have their best 22 players available all year?? NEVER.. so stop bleating about injuries like we're the only one who have to deal with them.
they are a contributing factor for EVERY team. It's silly to argue otherwise.
His argument seems to be that if you have 100,000 dollars, and lose 50,000 for no reason, that's the same as someone else with 100,000 dollars losing 10,000 for no reason, as neither of you have your full 100,000 anymore and you have both lost some money. An interesting approachAgain, this continued practice of making shoit up and telling me what I'm saying. It's clearly just a comprehension issue with you unable to grasp what is actually written and then just flip-flopping like a fish on a beach. Get back to me when you can actually articulate a real argument that actual relates to what I say rather than what you think I say.
His argument seems to be that if you have 100,000 dollars, and lose 50,000 for no reason, that's the same as someone else with 100,000 dollars losing 10,000 for no reason, as neither of you have your full 100,000 anymore and you have both lost some money. An interesting approach
I like the ins, I hope Caff is a late change for Cox feel with the weather we need to go small.
Never mind all of that -I like the ins, I hope Caff is a late change for Cox feel with the weather we need to go small.
I like the ins, I hope Caff is a late change for Cox feel with the weather we need to go small.