Remove this Banner Ad

Unofficial Preview Changes vs Freo: Cloke, Brown and Aish in, team in OP

your ins and outs

  • in Cloke

    Votes: 104 72.2%
  • in Aish

    Votes: 117 81.3%
  • in Goldsack

    Votes: 44 30.6%
  • in Brown

    Votes: 82 56.9%
  • Out Witts

    Votes: 96 66.7%
  • Out Frost

    Votes: 75 52.1%
  • Out Smith

    Votes: 39 27.1%
  • Out Crocker

    Votes: 55 38.2%
  • Out Sinclair

    Votes: 41 28.5%

  • Total voters
    144
  • Poll closed .

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I dont Swan wouldn't be much help to the forward line. If he was fit he'd be
Playing midfield.

I think the Plan at Start of the Season was him Playing Forward and a Few Midfield Minutes
 
I dont Swan wouldn't be much help to the forward line. If he was fit he'd be
Playing midfield.
He would be much help TO the fwd line regardless where he plays. And spend significant time IN the fwd line. Semantics aside, a loss not to be underestimated .
 
they are a contributing factor for EVERY team. It's silly to argue otherwise.
How they contribute is the question. It's not only how many but who, where they play and how many games they miss. Also have to look at the combination of players missing. Comparing clubs in terms of injury lists is a problem because the above factors impact teams in different ways.
Any side that suffers many injuries is bucketing water out of a leaky boat.
In how many ways does Swan's injury impact on the team?
 
How they contribute is the question. It's not only how many but who, where they play and how many games they miss. Also have to look at the combination of players missing. Comparing clubs in terms of injury lists is a problem because the above factors impact teams in different ways.
Any side that suffers many injuries is bucketing water out of a leaky boat.
In how many ways does Swan's injury impact on the team?
Swan biggest loss for us this season
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Oh ffs... Well done Captain obvious! Yes we would be a better team if we didn't have any injuries to best 22 players.!! brilliant deduction there. Never occurred to me. What you can't seem to grasp for some bizarre reason is that every other team would also be a better side if they had no injuries to their best 22 players. But they do.. and we do.. so it's a nil factor (read excuse) unless there is something unusually bad about our injury list... and at the moment there isn't. Is this starting to make sense to you yet? What part of that don't you understand consistently?.. , month after month, year after year?
When the F$ck does this little fantasy of yours ever happen in reality that AFL teams have their best 22 players available all year?? NEVER.. so stop bleating about injuries like we're the only one who have to deal with them.

Again, this continued practice of making shoit up and telling me what I'm saying. It's clearly just a comprehension issue with you unable to grasp what is actually written and then just flip-flopping like a fish on a beach. Get back to me when you can actually articulate a real argument that actual relates to what I say rather than what you think I say.
 
Again, this continued practice of making shoit up and telling me what I'm saying. It's clearly just a comprehension issue with you unable to grasp what is actually written and then just flip-flopping like a fish on a beach. Get back to me when you can actually articulate a real argument that actual relates to what I say rather than what you think I say.
His argument seems to be that if you have 100,000 dollars, and lose 50,000 for no reason, that's the same as someone else with 100,000 dollars losing 10,000 for no reason, as neither of you have your full 100,000 anymore and you have both lost some money. An interesting approach
 
His argument seems to be that if you have 100,000 dollars, and lose 50,000 for no reason, that's the same as someone else with 100,000 dollars losing 10,000 for no reason, as neither of you have your full 100,000 anymore and you have both lost some money. An interesting approach

While unknowingly expressing his furious agreement.
 
No excuses, boys are fresh we are at the G they are travelling, I really don't think Freo are any good (neither are we)

Sidebottom is the key if he is active and involved early he is huge for us, boys really seem to link well when that is happening.
 
I like the ins, I hope Caff is a late change for Cox feel with the weather we need to go small.

I'm actually really surprised Caff is in the mix, didn't think his VFL form was anything special. Could they bring in Tooves instead to free up either Reid or Howe to go forward and give us extra cover for their small forwards?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top