- Banned
- #1
How long do you think he will get?
Personally I didn't see much wrong. 1 week tops.
Personally I didn't see much wrong. 1 week tops.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Chicks Report
- Thread starter Locky
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
NO head contact at all.
He just shirt fronted him and the bloke had a shoudler injury.
Will be withdrawn but the AFL does cheat
He just shirt fronted him and the bloke had a shoudler injury.
Will be withdrawn but the AFL does cheat
I'm hoping for 2 but then i'm biased
Using the "Hall rule" if you guys had won tonight it would of been 1 week but since you lost probably 2. They'll let him come back for a GF
Using the "Hall rule" if you guys had won tonight it would of been 1 week but since you lost probably 2. They'll let him come back for a GF
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
imonebadddman
Senior List
- Oct 5, 2004
- 207
- 0
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Pacers//Colts//Milan
Ball was within 5 minutes when i saw it and no contact to the head so i dont see anything wrong with it. Though something could get made up by the review panel
Dingster
TheBrownDog
imonebadddman said:
Hard to predict what the tribunal will do, but it was a good hit and fired you up when you were very flat.
I think he may get off...boy did he get us back in the game...
bricebubbles
Draftee
- Jul 29, 2006
- 3
- 0
- AFL Club
- West Coast
i thik he will only get 1 week. this will only be because the match review pannrl will make up rubbish. i agree no head contact.
Frizzo
Club Legend
Cannot get a week. Victimised him after his "hit" on Sinclair, if they rub him out again (after Buckley got off...after Didak got off) I will go ballistic.
he'll get off, there was nothing wrong with it
I think the tribunal moves into finals mode and is less likely to rub a guy out for such a transgression.
But for those who saw nothing wrong - it was very late and deserved the report. Regular season - 1 to 2 weeks, but finals... I think you need to be a bit more out of line than to do something that would have been legal in other circumstances.
But then again who knows - lottery tribunal this year.
But for those who saw nothing wrong - it was very late and deserved the report. Regular season - 1 to 2 weeks, but finals... I think you need to be a bit more out of line than to do something that would have been legal in other circumstances.
But then again who knows - lottery tribunal this year.
- Jun 27, 2006
- 13,074
- 4,392
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Lakers,Internazionale, Man U
even if he gets a week he'll defend it. he has a lot of other incidents he can compare it to. eg. pickett/crowley and didak/scotland.
nibbles
All Australian
i reckon he should get off - all he did was stand his ground and the contact wasnt head high - the only bone of contention was that i think the ball may have been more than 5 away
the other bad thing is that he has a few demerit points to his name, so although the conatct may not warrant a week out, his points could add up to a week out...
nervous times... chicky is one of our most important players against the dogs because of the wealth of small forwards that they have... im more than a little worried atm
the other bad thing is that he has a few demerit points to his name, so although the conatct may not warrant a week out, his points could add up to a week out...
nervous times... chicky is one of our most important players against the dogs because of the wealth of small forwards that they have... im more than a little worried atm
Frizzo
Club Legend
nibbles said:
All he did was stand his ground? Sorry, he wasn't standing his ground, he wanted to hurt somebody. And he did...fairly.
Nothing in it. Fair bump, play on.
nibbles
All Australian
by stand his ground, i mean he didnt deviate illegally to get him - i dont have the footage right here, but it looked to me as though he 'stood his ground' - or in other words, held his position - this is what i think will get him off, or at least reduce his punishmentFrizzo said:
chicky was angry - he saw him coming, and put him fairly on his arse...
No case to answer.
Bring on the doggies!
Bring on the doggies!
Sir Razzle
Debutant
When do we find out about their decision on Chick? When do they hand out suspensions?
Jack Bauer
Debutant
Chick has been cleared. Shame he can hardly walk and probably won't play this week. We will miss his physical hardness.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
3Judd3
Team Captain
This is my first post here on BF 
I went to training today and Chicky didn't train with the main group he just walked/jogged laps. He looked in a bit of discomfort but I think he'll be ok to play on the wk end. Heres hoping anyway
I went to training today and Chicky didn't train with the main group he just walked/jogged laps. He looked in a bit of discomfort but I think he'll be ok to play on the wk end. Heres hoping anyway
- Jun 5, 2004
- 9,259
- 7,027
- AFL Club
- West Coast
3Judd3 said:This is my first post here on BF
I went to training today and Chicky didn't train with the main group he just walked/jogged laps. He looked in a bit of discomfort but I think he'll be ok to play on the wk end. Heres hoping anyway
I hope so! Chick=legend
Frizzo
Club Legend
The tribunal finally gets something right. Hallelujah!
