yaco55
Hall of Famer
I am unsure if people realise that the umpires access statistics after the game and use them to give their votes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Judd vs Collingwood says Hi
That suggest Brett Ratten knows as much as the umpires
Coach A
Swan 5
Judd 4
Ball 3
Pendles 2
Murphy 1
Coach B
Ball 5
Judd 4
Pendles 3
Swan 2
Russell 1
Judd and Ball could swap places and Ratten may have given Judd 5 whilst Malthouse only gave him 3
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
what's your point? for all you know Micky gave him 5.
"The Carlton skipper started the count a $21 long shot with TAB Sportsbet, but enhanced his reputation as an umpires' pet by polling an extraordinary 30 votes."
Umpires' pet...even the Herald Sun says so
My point is obvious, Ratten knows nothingwhat's your point? for all you know Micky gave him 5.
Judd was not even in the best 5 for Carlton that round 7 game..
Should the umpires vote with their two-page Hun spread in front of them? Betts kicked those goals against StKilda in junk time (although still thought there were a handful better players than Judd).
As to the three votes against Collingwood Judd kept breaking open the packs and I would have given the umpires zero credibility had they ignored his game (so it is all about opinion).
I am unsure if people realise that the umpires access statistics after the game and use them to give their votes.
Yeah Mick Malthouse gave a Carlton player 5 votes in a 52 point thrashing.
well, they don't
Might want to check that... they have access to them if they want... shouldn't be based on stats anyway, but I'm sure at times it probably helps back up the way you're thinking
Yeah Mick Malthouse gave a Carlton player 5 votes in a 52 point thrashing.
My point is obvious, Ratten knows nothing
Yet it was mentioned a few years back they would be giving the umpires stats when they hadnt done so previously, so either they changed their minds yet again or...actually one of the umpires was stated on On the Couch i think that they didn't have access to the stats after the game
Against the Pies the first time, we win by 9 goals. Pretty much control the game for the first half, up by 7 goals, let them back in during the third, put the foot back down, game over.
Swan and Johnson rotate off Judd and are involved in at least 10 scoring assists. In addition Judd turns the ball over resulting in Pies goals at least 5 times.
3 Votes Chris Judd.
Umpire credibility = zero.
Not even bothering with the Brownlow next year, its a farce.