Remove this Banner Ad

Christchurch Terror Attack

  • Thread starter Thread starter GldGoldy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
SunshineTiger said:
Mate he finished third, there are plenty in parliament who finished second and got in on a dodgy preference deal, dr Karen Phelps comes to mind I’m sure there are others she got 29% of the vote the other bloke got 41 and she got in,is that democracy?
Click to expand...
Dr Phelps got 29% of the Primary Vote, which isn't the same as Anning's vote in the senate.
She ended up with 51% in the Two-candidate-preferred result, which is how the winner of each seat in the House of Representatives is decided and it's far more democratic than First Past the Post.
 
Tygrys said:
So let me clarify this, if there is a reprisal massacre of Christians in any other part of the world in response to Christchurch you would say 'no' for a minutes silence?
Click to expand...
How many battles can you fight. There are wars going on across the globe, all equally tragic, but when it comes home so to speak, there is a bit more poignancy. Just human nature. Personally I feel for them all pretty much equally, until it becomes one of your friends or family.
 
ComfortablyNumb said:
He didn't finish "second," One Nation won two Queensland senate seats in the 2016 election, which were given to Pauline and Malcolm Roberts. Roberts was caught up in that dual citizen stuff and was declared ineligible, after a re-count, Fraser, who was listed 3rd on the list of One Nation candidates, was elected in place of Roberts. Not entirely sure why, but he abandoned One Nation and sat as an independent. He briefly joined Katter's Australian Party last year.
Click to expand...
Don't try and explain politics to simpletons.you're wasting your time.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

ComfortablyNumb said:
Dr Phelps got 29% of the Primary Vote, which isn't the same as Anning's vote in the senate.
She ended up with 51% in the Two-candidate-preferred result, which is how the winner of each seat in the House of Representatives is decided and it's far more democratic than First Past the Post.
Click to expand...
Winning on the back of preferences is like the moral premiership the pies won last uear
 
Tygrys said:
So let me clarify this, if there is a reprisal massacre of Christians in any other part of the world in response to Christchurch you would say 'no' for a minutes silence?
Click to expand...

Not at all. What I'm saying is I think it's worth examining why we (royal we) feel this particular tragedy so much more than when things like this happen in other parts of the world. But that doesn't change how we feel, and it's my opinion that it would be appropriate to acknowledge that.
 
Socrates2 said:
It's time for the club to cancel Andrew Bolts membership for one.
Click to expand...
thought police, fascist, marxist, totalitarian, despotic, how else would you describe your point of view?
give a plonker like bolt enough rope, that's what you do in a democracy.
you don't crush dissent, you beat it with facts, logic and education
 
roacheee said:
thought police, fascist, marxist, totalitarian, despotic, how else would you describe your point of view?
give a plonker like bolt enough rope, that's what you do in a democracy.
you don't crush dissent, you beat it with facts, logic and education
Click to expand...
Well I don't think it's despotic, it would be a good thing for the community if the club made a statement. You can't let these things fester imo.
 
Socrates2 said:
Well I don't think it's despotic, it would be a good thing for the community if the club made a statement. You can't let these things fester imo.
Click to expand...
what statement is that? what legal basis would the club have? would the club open itself up to claims of prejudicial conduct? murky waters.
 
roacheee said:
what statement is that? what legal basis would the club have? would the club open itself up to claims of prejudicial conduct? murky waters.
Click to expand...
The legal basis is that he is a convicted racist for breaching the racial discrimination act.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Socrates2 said:
The legal basis is that he is a convicted racist for breaching the racial discrimination act.
Click to expand...
does the club ban all herald-sun reporters because they 'the herald-sun'published the article?
 
Last edited:
jumpinjimmy said:
https://www.breitbart.com/africa/20...im-militants-kill-120-christians-three-weeks/. The reports are ubiquitous yet absent from the msm.

A video on the massacres:

https://www.infowars.com/the-truth-about-the-new-zealand-mosque-attack/

Probably the most balanced commentary I have seen:

Click to expand...


"His core grievances and his concerns about the society we are living have merit. His journey started out of legitimate fears" Tell me what hardships Tarrant has been forced to endure growing up in the NSW north coast? And even then living in a country like NZ? This guy who made this video is a serious fcuking snowflake. boo hoo life is so hard because the media are telling me who to feel sorry for. Grow the fckk up.

Tarrant was a personal trainer who's job gave him money to live a full life and travel the world. Spare me.
 
Last edited:

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Tiges1229 said:
and So begins the retaliation , terrorist attack in Netherlands on a tram , a shooter . This is only the start of bad days ahead imo .
Click to expand...
is this statement a joke? Have you not paid attention to the innumerable Islamic terrorist attacks on Europe over the last 10 years?
 
SumTingWong said:
is this statement a joke? Have you not paid attention to the innumerable Islamic terrorist attacks on Europe over the last 10 years?
Click to expand...

Not a joke at all and of course I’ve seen what’s happened over the last 10 years , I meant this is the start of a wave of new retaliation attacks in response to Christchurch .
 
Tiges1229 said:
Not a joke at all and of course I’ve seen what’s happened over the last 10 years , I meant this is the start of a wave of new retaliation attacks in response to Christchurch .
Click to expand...

Dickhead did what he did in christchurch in response to the myriad of attacks around the world. ISIS and the far right are as evil and twisted as each other.
 
jumpinjimmy said:
https://www.breitbart.com/africa/20...im-militants-kill-120-christians-three-weeks/. The reports are ubiquitous yet absent from the msm.

A video on the massacres:

https://www.infowars.com/the-truth-about-the-new-zealand-mosque-attack/

Probably the most balanced commentary I have seen:

Click to expand...

That video is not balanced, extremely one sided. Images of Hilary Clinton and Obama in relation to the wars in the Middle East, but where was Bush and Cheney etc who started it all. Nigerian extremists have been massacring both Muslim and Christians for the best part of a decade, in fact far more muslims have been killed in the conflict.... etc etc
 
Guys from the far right like Tommy Robinson are ruining the battle against terrorism, all cultures and big religions need to work together to stop the deadly hate that is present in the world at the moment. White people cannot hate islam because of terrorism because quite obviously we are just as bad as each other. If we want to stop the shootings and deaths of innocent people we need to put our differences aside.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

Michaels
    • Like
Analysis Ball movement analysis | COUNTER ATTACK FAILS
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
LC_15
LC_15

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom