- Dec 14, 2019
- 1,537
- 6,361
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Re-reading the decision on the admissibility of evidence from the last hearing 21-22Oct19, we may have to reconsider him going back to Huntingdale. According to DF and EC, they both still lived there at the time & I think I recall a Water Corp bill or something similar being produced to back that up in trial.
Finished 3 hours earlier than BRE & started 2 hours later!
Why would they go to work together! I'd suggest his wife was mistaken. She said she recalled it was a really hot day and he came to fix the aircon before work arriving at their house at 7.20am. We know it wasn't a hot day & it makes no sense he'd turn up in Thornlie 40mins before he's due to start work in West Perth & planned to fix the aircon first as well. I think she has her days mixed up.
The key date is January 26 1996. The DF and EB statements are contradictory. From WASC 418
EB eventually moved out to be with DF in early 1996. After this the accused was living at the former matrimonial home in Huntingdale on his own
...
In February 1996 EB went to the former matrimonial home to pick up her dog and some belongings.
...
DF decided to stay but moved about a month later in February 1996. He continued to see EB and she eventually moved in with him around February or March 1996.
Edit: But:
On a day leading up to Australia Day 1996 the accused attended unannounced at EB's mother's house and asked if she wished to accompany him to the Australia Day fireworks to be held in Mandurah. She declined to attend the fireworks with him.