Climate Change Arguing

[medusala]

The coward’s approach; if everyone else is looting, may as well help yourself to a free TV.

Absurd analogy. Its more like paying a fortune for an insurance policy that wont pay out.

Why make everyone poorer via policies that make no difference? Ah but then we really get to the nitty gritty as per Gillard using it as a convenient smoke screen to redistribute wealth. Dems have now cottoned on with their green new deal. The third world are in on it too.

 

[pugsville]

Which facts are those? If Australia reduces its carbon emissions to zero what impact would that have on global temperatures?

What does the SCIENCE say about that?

It's incredibly stupid There is problem which can be fixed. but chossing to nothing is just dumb.

What science is being ignored? The computer projections are simply models. Is it entirely rational to argue that global warming is real but there is no need to take drastic action.

It's not what the science and scientists say.
.

 

[medusala]

It's incredibly stupid There is problem which can be fixed. but chossing to nothing is just dumb.

Thats not what Tol argues.

It's not what the science and scientists say..

Would you ask a builder to future proof your house and not worry about the budget?

Regardless I assume you saw what happened in the libel case involving the author of the infamous hockey stick climate change graph.

 

[pugsville]

Thats not what Tol argues.



Would you ask a builder to future proof your house and not worry about the budget?

Regardless I assume you saw what happened in the libel case involving the author of the infamous hockey stick climate change graph.

The law can be an ass.

Still denying reality and introducing irrelevant arguments. The Vast majority of scientists and scientific organization agree, the problem is real.

Doing nothing willbe awfully expensive. Ignoring teh problem sio gross irresponsibie stupidty of the highest order.

 

[Lebbo73]

I thought you were leaving BF. Isn't that what you posted in the Test Cricket thread?

Pot, kettle, black

 

[Lebbo73]

The law can be an ass.

Still denying reality and introducing irrelevant arguments. The Vast majority of scientists and scientific organization agree, the problem is real.

Doing nothing willbe awfully expensive. Ignoring teh problem sio gross irresponsibie stupidty of the highest order.

Doing nothing is the best thing that can be done. The man made effects on climate will be that trivial and we will save 100’s of billions in the process. If we were serious we’d build at least five new efficient coal fired power stations. This would reduced emissions by 40%, not that I believe in this shit. Then in about 15 years when the technology catches up we build a few Gen 4 Nuclear power stations. These do not have dangerous nuclear reactors and minimal waste.

 

[Maggie5]

Pot, kettle, black

I never made outrageous posts in the Cricket thread.

So not a person of your word?

 

[quotemokc]

Nothing against firefighters but this is hilarious.

 

[pugsville]

Doing nothing is the best thing that can be done. The man made effects on climate will be that trivial and we will save 100’s of billions in the process. If we were serious we’d build at least five new efficient coal fired power stations. This would reduced emissions by 40%, not that I believe in this s**t. Then in about 15 years when the technology catches up we build a few Gen 4 Nuclear power stations. These do not have dangerous nuclear reactors and minimal waste.

Well only if you throw science and logic out the window.

You serious thing that Shifting in our nest endless is some sort of reasonable and substainable way to live and it will not bite us in the arse

CSIRO report costing of future cost of power Nuclear power is simply not competitive. How much faith do you have in givernment regulation ? Intelligent mokeys or dolphins or hyper intellignet shades of blue might be able to regulate nuclear power but I dont hold much hope for Humans doing so responsible way right now. Nuclear power is very expensive has massivelead times, huge regulation and corruption problems, waste problems and is dominated by huge vest corporate interests.

We're a very rich society. We spend much energy and resources producing abolutely useless rubbish. TWe can afford to live with more sustainability.

 

[pugsville]

Doing nothing is the best thing that can be done. The man made effects on climate will be that trivial and we will save 100’s of billions in the process. If we were serious we’d build at least five new efficient coal fired power stations. This would reduced emissions by 40%, not that I believe in this s**t. Then in about 15 years when the technology catches up we build a few Gen 4 Nuclear power stations. These do not have dangerous nuclear reactors and minimal waste.

Based on what? Your best guess? Excuse me if I don't think betting the future of th eplanet on that as opposed to your know actual **SCIENCE** is the way to inform decision making.

So you think your judgement is better than vast overwhelmingly majority of scientists and scientific organizations.

 

[Better Loosen Up]

So i see that one of the DEMANDS of the clueless that attended those rallies yesterday was "100% renewable energy by 2030"! Yep no worries, lets just give the big middle finger to our economy whilst experiencing more blackouts than North Korea and paying through the nose for the privilege. Sounds great!
Oh and they also want replacement jobs for everyone that works in the fossil fuel industries.... yep, no worries. We'll just invent a whole bunch of jobs out of thin air and force someone to pay for them. Awesome!
Everyone of those idiots parading around yesterday with their colorful apocalypse placards need to stop watching movies.
The fact that we have hundreds of thousands of f***ing pre pubescent children making these fanciful demands for the future of this country is bad news for all of us. We're well and truly f***ed!

 

[Better Loosen Up]

Nothing against firefighters but this is hilarious.

View attachment 750031

What's just as hilarious is the fact that they have conveniently chosen 1970 as the starting point for this chart (1970 was the end of the last cooling period). Coincidence?

 

[Lebbo73]

Based on what? Your best guess? Excuse me if I don't think betting the future of th eplanet on that as opposed to your know actual **SCIENCE** is the way to inform decision making.

So you think your judgement is better than vast overwhelmingly majority of scientists and scientific organizations.

There’s plenty of scientists, proper climate scientists, who think you’re speaking crazy talk from the conspiracy theory dimension.
Sea levels are rising by insignificant amounts in the Northern Hemisphere and dropping by even smaller amounts in the Southern Hemisphere.
Average temperatures across the globe are stable.
Wild storms, earthquakes, hurricanes, etc are slightly lower since the 1960’s.
Carbon dioxide levels make up 0.04% of gases in the atmosphere. Humans create 40% of this. Australia contributes 1.3% of this.
Every year that passes makes extremists like yourself look sillier. Give it up because you’re embarrassing yourself.

 

[pugsville]

There’s plenty of scientists, proper climate scientists, who think you’re speaking crazy talk from the conspiracy theory dimension.
Sea levels are rising by insignificant amounts in the Northern Hemisphere and dropping by even smaller amounts in the Southern Hemisphere.
Average temperatures across the globe are stable.
Wild storms, earthquakes, hurricanes, etc are slightly lower since the 1960’s.
Carbon dioxide levels make up 0.04% of gases in the atmosphere. Humans create 40% of this. Australia contributes 1.3% of this.
Every year that passes makes extremists like yourself look sillier. Give it up because you’re embarrassing yourself.

The overwhelming majoirtuy of scientist think it's real problem.
The overwhelming majority of climate scientists think it's real problem.
The overwhelming majority of scientific organizations think it;s a real problem.

If scientific opinion matters you are stone cold dead wrong. comprehensively,.

You are the who is choosing to go with something other than science.

 

[pugsville]

There’s plenty of scientists, proper climate scientists, who think you’re speaking crazy talk from the conspiracy theory dimension.
Sea levels are rising by insignificant amounts in the Northern Hemisphere and dropping by even smaller amounts in the Southern Hemisphere.
Average temperatures across the globe are stable.
Wild storms, earthquakes, hurricanes, etc are slightly lower since the 1960’s.
Carbon dioxide levels make up 0.04% of gases in the atmosphere. Humans create 40% of this. Australia contributes 1.3% of this.
Every year that passes makes extremists like yourself look sillier. Give it up because you’re embarrassing yourself.

There is not there is tiny tiny tiny minority.

Your Opinion Versus *** SCIENCE ****

I'll take the overwhelmingly consensus of scientific opinion.

 

[Better Loosen Up]

The overwhelming majoirtuy of scientist think it's real problem.
The overwhelming majority of climate scientists think it's real problem.
The overwhelming majority of scientific organizations think it;s a real problem.

If scientific opinion matters you are stone cold dead wrong. comprehensively,.

You are the who is choosing to go with something other than science.

Can you please read and edit your posts before sending them? The amount of errors in every one of your posts is doing my head in!

 

[Crankitup]

There’s plenty of scientists, proper climate scientists, who think you’re speaking crazy talk from the conspiracy theory dimension.
Sea levels are rising by insignificant amounts in the Northern Hemisphere and dropping by even smaller amounts in the Southern Hemisphere.
Average temperatures across the globe are stable.
Wild storms, earthquakes, hurricanes, etc are slightly lower since the 1960’s.
Carbon dioxide levels make up 0.04% of gases in the atmosphere. Humans create 40% of this. Australia contributes 1.3% of this.
Every year that passes makes extremists like yourself look sillier. Give it up because you’re embarrassing yourself.

I think the 40% is way too high actually. Agree with the rest.

 

[Better Loosen Up]

There is not there is tiny tiny tiny minority.

Your Opinion Versus *** SCIENCE ****

I'll take the overwhelmingly consensus of scientific opinion.

No worries. Hope you enjoy reading your articles that fancifully predict global catastrophe's and apocalypse. Whatever floats your boat. I'll stick to the real world thanks.

 

[Better Loosen Up]

I think the 40% is way too high actually.

I was thinking the same.

 

[pugsville]

No worries. Hope you enjoy reading your articles that fancifully predict global catastrophe's and apocalypse. Whatever floats your boat. I'll stick to the real world thanks.

Your the one choosing to ignore the overwhelming scientific opinion. And you think others are not living in the real world.

Again you have your opinion, but If you don't mind I'll chose **SCIENCE**.

 

[NSWCROW]

 

[Better Loosen Up]

Your the one choosing to ignore the overwhelming scientific opinion. And you think others are not living in the real world.

Again you have your opinion, but If you don't mind I'll chose **SCIENCE**.

1. It's "I'll choose" not "I'll chose"
2. Just because you type science in capital letters doesn't make it any more meaningful.
3. You are only choosing selective science anyway to support your confirmation bias
4. If you applied the same level of dedication to your english classes in school, your posts would be much easier to read.
5. The "real world" is not experiencing apocalyptic climate change. Thank your lucky stars that you are living in a very habitable period of time whilst sparing a thought for future generations who may end up living their whole lives through a mini ice age. Now that would well and truly suck!

 

[Better Loosen Up]

View attachment 750174

Why should we have young children who are at an age where they are lacking in critical thinking yet telling us what to do be splashed all over the front page?

When these little f***ers manage to achieve a level of basic english and maths that is comparable to the average of delevoped countries, that will be worthy of front page news.

 

[quotemokc]

View attachment 750174

Probably because it wasn't that big.

I heard way more about it during the build up for it than anything else.

 

[pugsville]

1. It's "I'll choose" not "I'll chose"
2. Just because you type science in capital letters doesn't make it any more meaningful.
3. You are only choosing selective science anyway to support your confirmation bias
4. If you applied the same level of dedication to your english classes in school, your posts would be much easier to read.
5. The "real world" is not experiencing apocalyptic climate change. Thank your lucky stars that you are living in a very habitable period of time whilst sparing a thought for future generations who may end up living their whole lives through a mini ice age. Now that would well and truly suck!

Really grammar errors. Your arguing against the vast overwhelming number of scientists and scientific organizations and the the nerve to talk about the real world.

Your arguing against **SCIENCE**.