Coaches votes - Finals

Remove this Banner Ad

Looks like the split was :

Gawn 5 - 3
Quaynor 5 - 1 or 4 - 2
Crisp 5-1 or 4 - 2
Hill 4 - 0
Petracca 3 - 0
Sidey 2 - 0
Oliver 1 - 0
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Gawn was best on by a mile, how you could have anyone ahead of him is baffling. If he wasn't playing Pies would have won by 40 points
The thing that may have pulled his vote down was that in the first quarter Cox towelled him up early and set the Pies on their way. As the game went on, Gawn started to dominate but he was beaten early.
 
The thing that may have pulled his vote down was that in the first quarter Cox towelled him up early and set the Pies on their way. As the game went on, Gawn started to dominate but he was beaten early.

That and Cameron was hampered by illness.

This is the biggest issue with Coaches Votes. One sees their player dominating, the other sees contributing factors to that domination.

Also you can't tell me Hinkley didn't give Butters an extra vote or two to get him higher in the award.
 
Very confident it would have been

McRae:
5 Quaynor
4 Hill
3 Gawn
2 Crisp
1 Quaynor

Goodwin:
5 Gawn
4 Crisp
3 Petracca
2 Sidebottom
1 Quaynor

Bit suspect on Petracca, played literally a quarter and a half of football .

Must have had his nose beers before nominating
 
Looks like the split was :

Gawn 5 - 3
Quaynor 5 - 1 or 4 - 2
Crisp 5-1 or 4 - 2
Hill 4 - 0
Petracca 3 - 0
Sidey 2 - 0
Oliver 1 - 0
Very confident it would have been

McRae:
5 Quaynor
4 Hill
3 Gawn
2 Crisp
1 Oliver

Goodwin:
5 Gawn
4 Crisp
3 Petracca
2 Sidebottom
1 Quaynor
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top