Horace
Premium Gold
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2001
- Posts
- 12,612
- Reaction score
- 29,569
- Location
- Boronia
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Fitzroy
I have listened to just about every morning Press Conference since covid-19 started to rear its ugly head, and in my view there has been pretty much a consistency right throughout.
It seems to me that from the outset that by and large the politicians have been taking advice from the Commonwealth Chief Medical Officer and the State Chief Medical/Health Officers and following that advice. Certainly some measures have changed over time but that is only to be expected in such a changing situation.
Is that the correct approach? Only time will tell, but if Governments and communities do not rely on the advice of presumably (and I believe they are) experts in their fields then what else should they do?
Is Australia getting it right with the slowing of the curve approach? Well the early evidence of a death rate of around 1% of infected Australians versus a global death rate of 4.146% of infections worldwide (WHO statistics) it seems to me that its working. Again it is early days and much much more "water to flow under the bridge".
Restricting non-essential indoor gatherings to less than 100 people, outdoor non-essential gatherings to less than 500 people, practicing "social distancing" (I've probably been doing that quite a bit throughout my life), encouraging far better hand hygiene, allowing more and more people to work from home, keeping schools open, (because clearly as children are far less susceptible to this disease so therefore starting to build immunity through safer sections of the community), are all decisions that I think are good ones.
Again only time will tell if the approach is correct, but none of us have seen this before (Spanish Flu 1918 survivors notwithstanding) so it seems to me that we do need to rely on the health experts - and there are some brilliant brains involved in that area working on this.
It seems to me that from the outset that by and large the politicians have been taking advice from the Commonwealth Chief Medical Officer and the State Chief Medical/Health Officers and following that advice. Certainly some measures have changed over time but that is only to be expected in such a changing situation.
Is that the correct approach? Only time will tell, but if Governments and communities do not rely on the advice of presumably (and I believe they are) experts in their fields then what else should they do?
Is Australia getting it right with the slowing of the curve approach? Well the early evidence of a death rate of around 1% of infected Australians versus a global death rate of 4.146% of infections worldwide (WHO statistics) it seems to me that its working. Again it is early days and much much more "water to flow under the bridge".
Restricting non-essential indoor gatherings to less than 100 people, outdoor non-essential gatherings to less than 500 people, practicing "social distancing" (I've probably been doing that quite a bit throughout my life), encouraging far better hand hygiene, allowing more and more people to work from home, keeping schools open, (because clearly as children are far less susceptible to this disease so therefore starting to build immunity through safer sections of the community), are all decisions that I think are good ones.
Again only time will tell if the approach is correct, but none of us have seen this before (Spanish Flu 1918 survivors notwithstanding) so it seems to me that we do need to rely on the health experts - and there are some brilliant brains involved in that area working on this.






