Gysberts2Bate
Brownlow Medallist
Cricket is unsurpassed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Visceral anti-English reaction: I hope those tea-sipping, soap dodging, small handed, cabbage odoured, pitch doctoring carnies enjoy their tie x 2, count back, hollow crown. No doubt there’ll be open top buses, parades, OBEs, MBEs and knighthoods. Or perhaps they could take all of that and the 4 off the bat, Seth African opener, Barbadian fast bowler, Irish captain, NZ born coward puncher, kolpak contracts and stick it all up their arse?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Australia play an intra-club match yesterday in preparation for the Ashes - and make an impressive 225 runs for the loss of 20 wickets...
Warner - 4
Harris - 6
Labuschagne - 41
Head - 1
Patterson - 2
Pucovski - 4
Carey - 6
Bancroft - 17
Burns - 18
Smith - 9
Wade - 10
Handscomb - 2
MMarsh - 29
Paine - 2
In some slightly relieving news, England are playing a test again Ireland and had their top order skittled to the tune of 7 for 43.
Crazy. (actually just incompetent)
Bancroft has now returned so the band is back together. I'm a little surprised with some of the selections - completely ignore previous form in the most recent series and just put most of the selection weight on a scratch match. Saying that, I woudn't have minded seeing Carey get a go. Not sure how long we're supposed to persist with Paine just because he's a nice guy.
Ireland were rolled for 38 in the last innings, too. Poms had a few missing from their best XI, and I'm shocked they think Jason Roy is a test cricketer.
I'm not terribly surprised with the selections as, outside of the bowlers, Warner, Smith and Paine* were really the only walk up starts. Maybe Khawaja (for the squad) as well. The rest have significant question marks.
What XI would you pick for the first test? I can't really confidently settle on an XI, just a squad of options.
1. Warner
2. Bancroft
3. Khawaja/Harris
4. Smith
5. Head
6. Labuschagne/Wade
7. Paine
8. Cummins
9. Pattinson
10. Siddle/Starc
11. Lyon
On what I think it's deserved form I'd have Harris, Khawaja and Wade in but that would leave us with 5 of the top 6 as lefties and the English bowlers have an excellent record against left handers so I'd probably have Bancroft and Marnus in for balance (and they've had reasonable form too).
The reports from the practice match were that Starc and Hazelwood looked short of a gallop which is why I didn't have them in and I think we'll have a rotation of our quicks through the series. I could live with Starc in over Siddle though I have a nagging doubt about him in English tests.
In terms of Jason Roy, the English top order is a carousel of failure. They'll be praying he can become Warner level competent.
* Paine is a walk up start purely by virtue of being the current Australian Captain. Hopefully he succeeds for our sake. Good chance Carey is keeper after the series.
I'd go with,
Warner
Bancroft
Khawaja
Smith
Head
Labuschagne
Paine
Cummins
Pattinson
Lyon
Siddle
i'd rest Starc for now. i'm backing in Siddle over Hazlewood. I think Hazlewood is the better bowler, but have found him a bit underwhelming for a while now, so i'd give Sids first crack, he can keep it tight and keep the pressure on.
for some reason i'm watching the European cricket league on Fox, good for a laugh. most of the players don't look European though.
yep thats the combo i'm looking forward to seeing with the new ball. could prove a real handful hopefully.Yep, that'll be the eleven for the first test. Don't mind the idea of Pattinson / Cummins opening up - should be lively for the likes of Roy and whoever opens with him. Been a revolving door for England there of late.
![]()
Australia bargain big three breakup as Mitchell Starc falls behind
Pat Cummins, Josh Hazlewood and Mitchell Starc have been told they won't play together in the first Ashes Test in order to help prolong their careers after being relied upon too heavily in previous major Test serieswww.espncricinfo.com
Crivens. Imagine telling McGrath, Gillespie and Lee that we're too reliant on them and that they won't play together.
"The last two or three years, we've been way too reliant on Cummins, Starc and Hazlewood - they've played a lot of Tests and subsequently picked up lots of niggly injuries along the way. It's a positive for all those guys."
Best quicks selected to play for country - we're too reliant on our best quicks! We need to play our next best bowlers so we're not so reliant on our best bowlers!
I think England will win because their bowlers and batsmen will be able to exploit the home conditions slightly better. Aussie bowlers should do well and England won’t rack up mammoth scores but it’s hard to see where the centuries come from for Australia. Apart from Smith, no current Australian has scored a test century in England. In short if Bancroft, Khawaja, Head and Wade surprise and can each score a ton in this series (assuming Smith and Warner do) Australia will retain the Ashes.I'm really quite excited about the Ashes. To me, it feels like this is going to be a very close series, pretty much 50/50 with no favourite in my eyes. I think it could very much be a contest similar to 2005 albeit clearly at much lower quality.
Two teams whose undoubted strengths are their bowling lineups, similar to the last Ashes in England, this will be decided by single sessions - disastrous batting capitulations that cost a match. Fingers crossed we have less collapses than they do.
I think it will be:
Warner
Bancroft
Khawaja
Smith
Head
Wade
Paine
Cummins
Pattinson
Siddle
Lyon
England
Burns
Roy
Denly
Root
Buttler
Bairstow
Stokes
Ali
Woakes
Broad
Anderson
Starc and Hazlewood out doesn’t bother me. Both are overrated imo.
Warner very lucky the poms didn't review that first ball to him
Got him in the end. First reaction to that LBW was that it was going down leg. Surprised he didn't review.
Has Warney spent some time off doing media training? He sounds a little weird and seems to be focusing more on enunciation. Perhaps his larrikin commentary persona has been shelved?