Power Raid
We Exist To Win Premierships
being only 24, he has plenty of time to improve his trade. With an average of 27 with the bat and ball he is already quality.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ignore the stats and I'm great.
Always hasbowling too short atm
What was the point of starting a thread if you didn't want discussion and only wanted people to stroke your ego and agree with you?Ignore the stats and I'm great.
I don't recall saying I wanted people to agree with me.What was the point of starting a thread if you didn't want discussion and only wanted people to stroke your ego and agree with you?
Our fourth best bowler has been our fourth best bowler
Before the series, you wouldn't have picked him ahead of Hazlewood or Starc, surely, which makes him the third quick. As far as third quicks go around the world, he goes pretty well.
Collectively, a side of good batsmen will feed off each other, leading each other onto greater and greater scores as they don't take runs off each other. Bowlers, on the other hand, take wickets off each other, which is alright when you've 1 or two good bowlers running around but not when you've 4 at about the same level. All of a sudden you get players who have a dud series due almost to the luck of the draw, and people talking about them as though they're ordinary when in fact they've been the unlucky one this time around. Take a look at Hazlewood and Starc's incredible averages/strike rates over this series - and Lyons too - and you'll get why he hasn't taken wickets as often as he maybe should.
Most countries can't field attacks this quick, or this varied. England'd kill for a young up and comer like Cummins.
Sorry but how does that excuse fly? He's bowled more overs than Hazlewood and taken less wickets, meaning he is worse and hasn't taken those wickets so Haze et al had to.Take a look at Hazlewood and Starc's incredible averages/strike rates over this series - and Lyons too - and you'll get why he hasn't taken wickets as often as he maybe should.
Most countries can't field attacks this quick, or this varied. England'd kill for a young up and comer like Cummins.
Sorry, but cherry-picking parts of my post to help your argument is rather thin.Sorry but how does that excuse fly? He's bowled more overs than Hazlewood and taken less wickets, meaning he is worse and hasn't taken those wickets so Haze et al had to.
Shane Watson wishes he had this much defence. (On the field and off)
But if he was good enough, he would be getting those wickets considering he bowled the same amount of overs. Your logic is severely flawed. It's not as if he bowled a few overs and the others took all the wickets in more overs.Sorry, but cherry-picking parts of my post to help your argument is rather thin.
There are 10 wickets in an innings. Bowlers take wickets off each other. If Hazlewood/Starc/Lyon have good series - and they have - where does that leave Cummins, other than short a few wickets?
If he was as good or better than Hazelwood, Starc, Lyon then yeahBut if he was good enough, he would be getting those wickets considering he bowled the same amount of overs.
Only if you assume there is no element of luck of the draw involved.But if he was good enough, he would be getting those wickets considering he bowled the same amount of overs. Your logic is severely flawed. It's not as if he bowled a few overs and the others took all the wickets in more overs.
Well then, lets just throw out all the stats and base it on luck of the draw. Despite this happening in 4 straight test matches.Only if you assume there is no element of luck of the draw involved.
It's one of the things we don't like to mention, but despite all the skill and the work a cricketer puts into their bowling, there's still a fair element of luck involved when you get a wicket. Put your plans in place, watch the tape to see your opponent's weaknesses, but even if you get it right the ball could flash past the edge, take the bat before the pad, get too much bounce and go over the stumps.
In this series, the others have had more luck than Cummins; otherwise, how else did Lyon get Root in the first dig in Perth? It wasn't a good ball by any measure.
Hyperbole much?Well then, lets just throw out all the stats and base it on luck of the draw. Despite this happening in 4 straight test matches.
You heard it folks, cricket = luck. Thats it.