Dangerfield or Fyfe

[Escobar123]

He is already the best contested marking midfielder in the game



As for the poll, went with Fyfe. Dangerfield this year (his 4th overall in the AFL) was only slightly more impressive than Fyfe's 2011 (his 2nd year) so all those saying Danger is a class above or miles better are kidding themselves. As long as he stays injury free, he will go past Dangerfield and other young midfielders next year imo

http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/...2=2&pid2=2310&type=A&fid1=P&fopt1=2011&fid2=S


2011 Stats for Season 2012
21 Games 25
12.0 Kicks Per Game 15.6
13.0 Handballs Per Game 11.1
25.1 Disposals Per Game 26.7
5.3 Marks Per Game 4.2
0.9 Goals Per Game 0.9
0.7 Behinds Per Game 0.4
4.0 Tackles Per Game 3.1
0.5 Hitouts Per Game 0.3
0.9 Frees For Per Game 1.8
1.0 Frees Against Per Game 1.0
12.5 Contested Possessions Per Game 16.1
12.7 Uncontested Possessions Per Game 11.0
15.4 Effective Disposals Per Game 16.8
61.4% Effective Disposals % Per Game 62.9%
3.3 Clangers Per Game 3.1
2.0 Contested Marks Per Game 0.6
1.0 Marks Inside 50 Per Game 0.4
3.6 Clearances Per Game 6.5
1.6 Rebound 50s Per Game 2.0
2.4 One Percenters Per Game 1.5
1.1 Bounces Per Game 0.9
88.4 Time On Ground % Per Game 85.2

 

[headache1]

He is already the best contested marking midfielder in the game



As for the poll, went with Fyfe. Dangerfield this year (his 4th overall in the AFL) was only slightly more impressive than Fyfe's 2011 (his 2nd year) so all those saying Danger is a class above or miles better are kidding themselves. As long as he stays injury free, he will go past Dangerfield and other young midfielders next year imo

This year has been Dangerfield's first as a full time midfielder.

And one stat that's missing from there which is reasonably important for a midfielder, is that he was 2nd in the league for Inside 50's per game this year.

I'd be more than happy with Fyfe, but given the choice, I'll take Dangerfield every day of the week.

 

[The Joker]

This year has been Dangerfield's first as a full time midfielder.

And one stat that's missing from there which is reasonably important for a midfielder, is that he was 2nd in the league for Inside 50's per game this year.

I'd be more than happy with Fyfe, but given the choice, I'll take Dangerfield every day of the week.

Fyfe has had 1 uninterrupted preseason and has just finished his 3 season, people are comparing him to a guy that's been in the program for 5 seasons. It's not surprising Danger is wining this poll but there is just so much improvement left in Fyfe.

 

[headache1]

Fyfe has had 1 uninterrupted preseason and has just finished his 3 season, people are comparing him to a guy that's been in the program for 5 seasons. It's not surprising Danger is wining this poll but there is just so much improvement left in Fyfe.

5 years is a bit of a stretch. He played 2 games toward the end of his first year and was living in Victoria finishing school (drafted at 17). To be honest, I think there's a hell of a lot of improvement left in both of them, and they'll both end up in the top handful of players in the competition before long.

 

[The Joker]

5 years is a bit of a stretch. He played 2 games toward the end of his first year and was living in Victoria finishing school (drafted at 17). To be honest, I think there's a hell of a lot of improvement left in both of them, and they'll both end up in the top handful of players in the competition before long.

Yeah no doubt I was stretching the yarn, but, he didn't as you make it sound walk out of high school and then play 2 games of AFL. He was at the club training in 2008. Compare that to Nat Fyfe who was still playing under 16s.

 

[ndot]

dangerfield = GUN
fyfe = decent midfielder with below average foot skills

dangerfield by a MILE

 

[marcosantiago54]

Fyfe goes great.

Form I-9