jenny61_99
Premium Platinum
Yep, thanks for the clarification.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

You choose the best "leader" whoever that might be.
I seriously disagree with you that the players aren't fit to choose their own captain. I can't think of anyone better qualified, not even the coaching staff.
Fair to say that North didn't have a "leadership program" in place, like the Crows do now (and have had for several years)?What are your thoughts on the North Melbourne situation then? In 93, Pagan appointed the 21yo Carey as captain, in a decision which stunned the playing group - especially the older players.
I dont think some players are capable of determining who of their "mates" is the best man for the job. It would be like a group of employees being able to choose their own boss.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
damn... you beat me to it...It's official ... Patrick has this afternoon signed another contract with the Crows. You beauty!!! - Adelaide Crows FB
It's official ... Patrick has this afternoon signed another contract with the Crows. You beauty!!! - Adelaide Crows FB
The club are doing a great job of signing up all our stars.. Only Knights & Thompson outstanding at this stage.
There was never ANY substance to those rumours. It was just a case of "the team is performing badly, therefore the players can't be happy, therefore the coach must have lost them" logic. The jump from step #1 to step #2 is deeply flawed, the jump from step #2 to step #3 even more so.I wonder if this puts paid to all the suggestions that Craig had lost the players and that there were "serious problems" - at least amongst the playing group. For all of them to be more than happy to sign contracts, you'd have to assume that as far as they are concerned, everything is ok?
Didn't know you had Primus and Francou ?You beauty
Batman and Robin are here to stay..

There was never ANY substance to those rumours. It was just a case of "the team is performing badly, therefore the players can't be happy, therefore the coach must have lost them" logic. The jump from step #1 to step #2 is deeply flawed, the jump from step #2 to step #3 even more so.


There was never ANY substance to those rumours. It was just a case of "the team is performing badly, therefore the players can't be happy, therefore the coach must have lost them" logic. The jump from step #1 to step #2 is deeply flawed, the jump from step #2 to step #3 even more so.

I knew that, and you knew that... but by god it was hard to convince them of that!![]()

Please don’t be so condescending, like me, you have no idea what the hell happens inside the inner sanctum of the club.
You don’t know if the he lost the players or not, you don’t know how or what form of negotiations the club has taken to get the players signature. So don’t post stuff to discredit people who are very anti Neil Craig and make them sound stupid.
Like me, you don’t know and are only surmising on an opinion.![]()

Nobody has to post anything to make you sound stupid. You manage that all by yourself!![]()
I knew that, and you knew that... but by god it was hard to convince them of that!![]()
For what it's worth, I wasn't complaining about being picked on at all. Just made a fair (I thought, given the schtick I received) observation that perhaps my thoughts were closer to the mark than the conspiracy theorists. He may well have lost the players... like you say, we'll never know. What is clear now, though, that he has certainly got them back.

The game against port adelaide really showed us naysayers.![]()
Read what I said properly before you go off half cocked.