Time to leave.....
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Oppo Camp Dangerfield's Gone (Zero tolerance to trolling) - READ THREAD LINKED IN OP BEFORE POSTING
- Thread starter Tex Support
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Time to leave.....
Was thinking something similar regarding sending a pick back such as 9+ Cockatoo + next years first (or Murdoch) for Danger + our 2nd this year
- Oct 3, 2007
- 3,497
- 3,816
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- All OZ BBallerz,PPenguins,CBengals
Half this thread is about explaining to dumbarses what RFA actually is and means.
FFS if you are gonna come here and try and have an intelligent conversation, at least bring some intelligence to the post or you look like a bunch of trolls revelling in the unhappiness of others.
I mean, how shitty is your life to need to fill your time being an ignorant miserable twat.
FFS if you are gonna come here and try and have an intelligent conversation, at least bring some intelligence to the post or you look like a bunch of trolls revelling in the unhappiness of others.
I mean, how shitty is your life to need to fill your time being an ignorant miserable twat.
billy fragos
Premiership Player
- Jun 2, 2014
- 3,922
- 2,823
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
- Jun 10, 2009
- 29,794
- 44,888
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Panthers, GWV Rebels Beaufort Crows
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-09-...micable-discussions-on-dangerfield-says-scott
So to the Geelong supporters who think we should still take the compo pick and run......don't look like that's the way Wells and Hocking see it...
So to the Geelong supporters who think we should still take the compo pick and run......don't look like that's the way Wells and Hocking see it...
Because he is a RESTRICTED free agent. When we match geelongs deal they have to trade. What would you trade for danger?
The other big question is, WTF are Lloyds credentials for this role? Never even coached his own football team. Cant even get a job as a senior coach. How does this work?
What happens if cats offered a ridiculous amount of cash that was hard to match? That's not trying to be a smart....
For your question - first round plus a quality player and/or swap of picks? I guess that player depends on your list needs
They can if they trade a player and 9 to melbourne or gold coast.
- Apr 12, 2012
- 4,536
- 7,785
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Ricciardo, Red Sox
Go back and read the last 143 pages of this thread and the 2000 odd pages in the Dangerfield thread.
Geelong don't want to do that because one of their core principles is wage equality.
Fact ; cats are not going to break the bank for pd. anything under a mil a year we match. I personally want pick 9, cockatoo and 2016 first rd pick.
So there is a article saying Geelong and Adelaide talks are amicable.
So surely that is going to stop this talk of compo only, because Geelong wouldn't be talking if it knew Adelaide wasn't going to match
So surely that is going to stop this talk of compo only, because Geelong wouldn't be talking if it knew Adelaide wasn't going to match
I wouldn't think Gore would be a problem, he hasn't played a game.
Murdoch could be valuable and he's got a younger brother who we could target later so we have crouches, talias and murdochs.
Pity we cant have a pair of Shazzas now
billy fragos
Premiership Player
- Jun 2, 2014
- 3,922
- 2,823
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
I wish we could trade with literally any other VIC par maybe North. Imagine he wanted to go to Essendon or something, Pick 4 + Carlisle. St kilda, Melbourne, Hawthorn, Bulldogs would give very good trades as well.
Selfish prick
Selfish prick
Well, we've certainly never handed it out to two players in one year.
The DOC role has become a all care and no responsibility type of role
I don't get the role.at all
Noooo. Not Essadun.
They'd offer us McKernan plus Skipworth and a third.
And tell us we were lucky
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Mahlepi
Cancelled
Brownlow night will be interesting for the danger man as Bruce often puts people in squirmy position with his comments. Not sure how comfortable PD will be when he doesnt control the interaction.
- Oct 6, 2012
- 14,261
- 29,458
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
"I haven't thought about it yet Bruce."
Hi Hutchy still think there won't be a trade?
SugarShane
C12 H22 O11
Supports Brisbane, can't even spell Rockliff properly
Have you seen how many people on our board think we have players called Ottens, Sloan, Riley and Mckay?
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-09-...micable-discussions-on-dangerfield-says-scott
So that ticks off one of the Geelong BF boys main positions. So there will be no "blow them out of the water with a massive 2 year contract" - hopefully we don't hear it from them again.
And the guys from the Geelong BF Board that were promising perma-bans of AFC and Geelong end up trading for Dangerfield must be feeling a little concerned that a trade deal is being discussed. I'm looking forward to the trade week almost as much as I'm looking forward to next years season.
Scott said the club would continue its "egalitarian approach" when dealing with future contract discussions, citing the club's ability to maintain a strong playing list over the past decade.
He added the potential signing of Dangerfield would be no exception to that method.
"Often there is a premium associated with bringing players in from other clubs but I think Geelong's success in the modern era is based around an egalitarian approach to the TPP (Total Player Payments)," Scott said.
"And whatever we do over the next year or two, we won't be compromising on that."
He added the potential signing of Dangerfield would be no exception to that method.
"Often there is a premium associated with bringing players in from other clubs but I think Geelong's success in the modern era is based around an egalitarian approach to the TPP (Total Player Payments)," Scott said.
"And whatever we do over the next year or two, we won't be compromising on that."
So that ticks off one of the Geelong BF boys main positions. So there will be no "blow them out of the water with a massive 2 year contract" - hopefully we don't hear it from them again.
And the guys from the Geelong BF Board that were promising perma-bans of AFC and Geelong end up trading for Dangerfield must be feeling a little concerned that a trade deal is being discussed. I'm looking forward to the trade week almost as much as I'm looking forward to next years season.
Missed the sarcasm?
There's absolutely no scenario where PD plays somewhere other than Geelong next season.
Well seeing as neither Danger or Geelong have the ability to make that scenario happen on their own, your certainty is peculiar
He doesn't get there in the draft, and he doesn't get there without our help
So if you can't see any alternate scenarios then that just says you lack imagination not that the outcome is certain
Similar threads
- Poll
