I was being complimentary, he's not the primary beneficiary of Sauce's ruck work.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Oppo Camp Dangerfield's Gone (Zero tolerance to trolling) - READ THREAD LINKED IN OP BEFORE POSTING
- Thread starter Tex Support
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
I was being complimentary, he's not the primary beneficiary of Sauce's ruck work.
Unfortunate timing. Wasnt directed at anyone in particular.
Dangerfield's clearance numbers will be interesting though.
This pitchfork, Pitch 14, feels about right for your ass Connors.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
We need to get Hell Kitty over here.
Cam McCarthy comparison isn't really valid as he's still contracted for next year. Neither he nor the Dockers have any leverage whatsoever against GWS in those negotiations, so they have to pay overs, and BIG overs. So yeah, this year they're offering 2 1st round picks. If GWS don't take it then next year the price when he's out of contract will be 1 pick.
More talking about how he has fit into our team compared with Geelong.
I think he will be more effective in the Geelong squad to be honest ... they should get 3 or 4 really good years with him.
I bet they somehow get him more on the outside where we'll see his speed and better disposal with that bit of extra time. I'm ready to spew.
- Feb 3, 2004
- 17,999
- 24,204
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- panthers, ukraine & broncos
Oh god no. I tried to calm that down on PM and got shot entering the conversation
She did send me a photo before she blocked me though ...
Yeah, I get that, but like GWS, WE actually have leverage because he doesn't want to go anywhere but Geelong and will get picked up by others in the draft. For our recruiting team to say that the trade value of Danger is less than Cam McCarthy, less than Treloar and historically SIGNIFICANTLY less than Beams and Judd (in a 'shallow' draft) is just absolutely terrible trading.
- Mar 5, 2015
- 2,861
- 3,429
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
gws should show compassion. Just ask the Geelong board.
I'd feel a bit cheated to be honest but it would depend entirely on where we play him and how we use him. Could be a Westhoff type player with the emphasis on could.
- May 3, 2013
- 10,243
- 10,393
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Australian Cricket Team,
if you dont value your sanity.
Yea she got upset at me too haha....I mentioned about the compassion the cats fans are asking for.......and she asked me to show her 1 post where a cats fan has stated, we should show compassion to PD. Fair to say I couldn't be f****dOh god no. I tried to calm that down on PM and got shot entering the conversation
She did send me a photo before she blocked me though ...
Johnny Rutten
Anarchy for the AFC, it's coming sometime...
Westhoff without the footy smarts. Oh wait, that's Rhys Stanley.
WaynesWorld19
Post-Human
Was BOG clearly in his last game
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
I guess he was referring to other list changes we've made as well
if we give up Danger for picks 9 & 28, then the current admin is no better than under twiggy. I will be disgusted
why? because in a FA environment, you have 2 levers. it is a tight economy between cap and assets, a little more of one a little less of the other. like a set of old fashioned scales
we are all surprised that Geelong have tried to low ball Paddy, when they could get him for nothing by upping the offer to a market value. it makes no sense. except... when you step back and look at what they are doing overall.
they can use cap space or they can give up assets, and they have chosen to give up assets because their cap space is more limited. if they use cap space to sign danger, and keep assets it doesn't matter because there is no way they can add Henderson, Selwood and Zmith as well. can't be done.
so cap space is worth more to them than assets, because that is the tightest pinch point. it is finite in the extreme
which means that he can't go in the draft, because they won't have the cap space to price him out. the pie is spread very thing to add all these blokes.
so they need to give up assets, to get him for a certain price so they can fit in the other blokes and begin Geelong 2.0
they have no ****ing leverage because they can only get for cheap in a trade. any other way and they miss out. so if they have chosen the assets rather than cap route, we better make them ****ing squeak.
they have no alternatives, and I don't want to hear the words off-limits. if players are off limits, then they need to give him some money and go down that route. oh wait you can't!
9 & 28 is a capitulation given we know what they are up to, and how many balls they have in the air. and don't be adding b/c grade talent to sweeten the pot.
if they can't get PD I wonder how many of the others will be drinking the Kool-aid still, and it might all come crashing down.
we need to be bringing home a very big asset haul, because we have them by the balls if we know what we are doing. I wonder if we do?
why? because in a FA environment, you have 2 levers. it is a tight economy between cap and assets, a little more of one a little less of the other. like a set of old fashioned scales
we are all surprised that Geelong have tried to low ball Paddy, when they could get him for nothing by upping the offer to a market value. it makes no sense. except... when you step back and look at what they are doing overall.
they can use cap space or they can give up assets, and they have chosen to give up assets because their cap space is more limited. if they use cap space to sign danger, and keep assets it doesn't matter because there is no way they can add Henderson, Selwood and Zmith as well. can't be done.
so cap space is worth more to them than assets, because that is the tightest pinch point. it is finite in the extreme
which means that he can't go in the draft, because they won't have the cap space to price him out. the pie is spread very thing to add all these blokes.
so they need to give up assets, to get him for a certain price so they can fit in the other blokes and begin Geelong 2.0
they have no ****ing leverage because they can only get for cheap in a trade. any other way and they miss out. so if they have chosen the assets rather than cap route, we better make them ****ing squeak.
they have no alternatives, and I don't want to hear the words off-limits. if players are off limits, then they need to give him some money and go down that route. oh wait you can't!
9 & 28 is a capitulation given we know what they are up to, and how many balls they have in the air. and don't be adding b/c grade talent to sweeten the pot.
if they can't get PD I wonder how many of the others will be drinking the Kool-aid still, and it might all come crashing down.
we need to be bringing home a very big asset haul, because we have them by the balls if we know what we are doing. I wonder if we do?
- Jun 15, 2005
- 69,233
- 60,483
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- AUFC, Everton, Sturt
The ONLY possible way we should take 9 & 28 is if we know for fact they'll get him in the PSD. Since that's unlikely then we must go for broke, if we don't we've done a bad job. Not a horrific fail like some of you proclaim but its not a great result.if we give up Danger for picks 9 & 28, then the current admin is no better than under twiggy. I will be disgusted
why? because in a FA environment, you have 2 levers. it is a tight economy between cap and assets, a little more of one a little less of the other. like a set of old fashioned scales
we are all surprised that Geelong have tried to low ball Paddy, when they could get him for nothing by upping the offer to a market value. it makes no sense. except... when you step back and look at what they are doing overall.
they can use cap space or they can give up assets, and they have chosen to give up assets because their cap space is more limited. if they use cap space to sign danger, and keep assets it doesn't matter because there is no way they can add Henderson, Selwood and Zmith as well. can't be done.
so cap space is worth more to them than assets, because that is the tightest pinch point. it is finite in the extreme
which means that he can't go in the draft, because they won't have the cap space to price him out. the pie is spread very thing to add all these blokes.
so they need to give up assets, to get him for a certain price so they can fit in the other blokes and begin Geelong 2.0
they have no ******* leverage because they can only get for cheap in a trade. any other way and they miss out. so if they have chosen the assets rather than cap route, we better make them ******* squeak.
they have no alternatives, and I don't want to hear the words off-limits. if players are off limits, then they need to give him some money and go down that route. oh wait you can't!
9 & 28 is a capitulation given we know what they are up to, and how many balls they have in the air. and don't be adding b/c grade talent to sweeten the pot.
if they can't get PD I wonder how many of the others will be drinking the Kool-aid still, and it might all come crashing down.
we need to be bringing home a very big asset haul, because we have them by the balls if we know what we are doing. I wonder if we do?
The other thing is getting guys who WANT to come to this club, and city. We've seen that this is an issue for us. So it's all well and good to say we want player X, but if he doesn't want to come to Adelaide what do we do ?? It's a fine line between sending him to the PSD in the pathetic attempt to send a message, and accepting unders because our list demands we take the picks.
Samcro24
Covered by the Cape
- Oct 28, 2014
- 12,828
- 35,120
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Do they need to price him out in the draft though?if we give up Danger for picks 9 & 28, then the current admin is no better than under twiggy. I will be disgusted
why? because in a FA environment, you have 2 levers. it is a tight economy between cap and assets, a little more of one a little less of the other. like a set of old fashioned scales
we are all surprised that Geelong have tried to low ball Paddy, when they could get him for nothing by upping the offer to a market value. it makes no sense. except... when you step back and look at what they are doing overall.
they can use cap space or they can give up assets, and they have chosen to give up assets because their cap space is more limited. if they use cap space to sign danger, and keep assets it doesn't matter because there is no way they can add Henderson, Selwood and Zmith as well. can't be done.
so cap space is worth more to them than assets, because that is the tightest pinch point. it is finite in the extreme
which means that he can't go in the draft, because they won't have the cap space to price him out. the pie is spread very thing to add all these blokes.
so they need to give up assets, to get him for a certain price so they can fit in the other blokes and begin Geelong 2.0
they have no ******* leverage because they can only get for cheap in a trade. any other way and they miss out. so if they have chosen the assets rather than cap route, we better make them ******* squeak.
they have no alternatives, and I don't want to hear the words off-limits. if players are off limits, then they need to give him some money and go down that route. oh wait you can't!
9 & 28 is a capitulation given we know what they are up to, and how many balls they have in the air. and don't be adding b/c grade talent to sweeten the pot.
if they can't get PD I wonder how many of the others will be drinking the Kool-aid still, and it might all come crashing down.
we need to be bringing home a very big asset haul, because we have them by the balls if we know what we are doing. I wonder if we do?
I think he gets to geelong at 9 in the ND. Someone would take the free hit in the psd, no doubt. Not so sure anyone would take the punt with a top 8 pick in the draft though.
Similar threads
- Poll
