Is that journalist an idiot or am I wrong that the main draft contract can't be less than two years and a player can't stipulate conditions. That's the PSD so the "using a premium pick" argument is bullshit.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Oppo Camp Dangerfield's Gone (Zero tolerance to trolling) - READ THREAD LINKED IN OP BEFORE POSTING
- Thread starter Tex Support
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Its jay clark enough said
Bovo
Premium Platinum
Players can stipulate years + income in the psd. The difference is that any team that gets a pick has the option to take it on.
Seriously what the **** did geelong think was going to happen. I dont understand the reasoning in not paying premium (over 1 mil per year) for pd. when every other free agent has left his club and they dont match its because their new club has dropped a rich offer infront of the player which effectively rules out the other party.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
- Oct 3, 2003
- 26,916
- 30,913
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Soft spot for Brisbane
They could have matched, maybe. They didn't match. We will. They should have.
I can't see what your point is??
It can't possibly be an even value trade, but it will be better than the compo pick Geelong thinks we should be happy with. (LOL) Anything better than the compo pick is a win.
footywedge
Team Captain
Tell me, how would we be unable to match? No matter what it is, we can match because we won't get "stuck" with him - he's going. He'll reject our "matched" offer. Hawthorn couldn't match Buddy's deal because he would have stayed! This is especially true given the exact terms (front end back end) dont have to be matched but rather, overall years and dollars.
A really low number like that - that'd be worth thinking about. Didn't Frawly result in pick 3?…hmmm not sure Frawls and Danger are in the same class though.
- Moderator
- #4,086
Will be better than a couple of mid to late first rounders that we'll get from Geelong
So he is happy to screw over someone who gave his all to the club for 8 years, and deny him the right to go home/where he wants?....Not saying you dont deserve adequate compo, but seems like a dog thing to say from Roo dont you think?
#cantsaynotoroo
Mahlepi
Cancelled
I think we will have a nice chat about the topic in a few weeksNo chance.
Will be too busy deleting his posts!
Mahlepi
Cancelled
The same pay structure they were going to break to keep Ablett
Don't believe the whole media spin
Heard rumour that geelong have gone to initial trade discussions with pick 9 and GHS as a potential offer
Crows wanting 2 1st rounders and a player and NOT GHS
Think this will end up somewhere in the middle of those offers
Crows wanting 2 1st rounders and a player and NOT GHS
Think this will end up somewhere in the middle of those offers
Not if Adelaide and Geelong can't work something out. Roo makes a valid point. If someone like Melbourne pick him up for a year for free he loses his FA rights and if Geelong want him they have to give adequate compo at the trade table for him. If I were Melbourne I'd do it in a heartbeat.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
The thing I liked about this is that it brought the flip side of the coin to my attention. I knew that Melbourne would obviously get really good trade value for him at the end of one year, but I didn't really consider the other side of that being that Geelong will have to offer a lot more to get him in that situation than what they would have to now.
Ie Melbourne could quite rightfully ask for two first rounders, a second and not budge. We don't hold that type of currency.
It is actually in Geelong's best interests to avoid that situation. As well as Adelaide's, Dangers.
Pretty confident a reasonable deal will get done - just not sure what that is.
- Mar 5, 2015
- 2,861
- 3,429
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Disagree. A dog move would be not giving an adequate trade to a club, for a player who has put himself out there, by telling his current club he wants to move to a new club who has approached the player with a contract.
Iron
Norm Smith Medallist
- May 26, 2014
- 7,170
- 15,280
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
It would only come to that if patty tried to screw us over first, so somehow I don't think we'd care.
You lot must be getting nervous all of a sudden. Thought you were getting him for free, didn't you?
*PAF
Brownlow Medallist
10k Posts
Port Adelaide - Nathan Krakouer Player Sponsor 2015
Port Adelaide - Brendon Ah Chee Player Sponsor 2014
Port Adelaide - Jarrad Redden Player Sponsor 2014
Port Adelaide - Matthew Broadbent Player Sponsor 2013
Port Adelaide - Foundation Sponsor
Port Adelaide - Captains Club 2012 Sponsor
Port Adelaide - John Butcher 2012 Player Sponsor
- Feb 17, 2005
- 22,024
- 10,285
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Haven't followed this thread lately so this might be out of context but its more than just Betts.
Carlton really stuffed up with their forward line when you add up all the goals the players they let walk have scored.
Betts 63
Waite 42
Garlett 40
Last edited:
Their revised and improved offer is rumored to be: "Here, have a first round draft pick and a bag of potatoes".
- Mar 5, 2015
- 2,861
- 3,429
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
I don't know who has what salary cap space. I doubt anyone on bf does either. Can't rule it out unless we know for sure.
Similar threads
- Poll
