Are you insane? Your first option sees us get 1 first Rd pick for Danger. Why waste the effort posting that?R9 this year and R1 next year and pick 14 back to the Cats.
Or
R1 this year and Murdoch (no Gregson, no ****) and not a penny more.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Are you insane? Your first option sees us get 1 first Rd pick for Danger. Why waste the effort posting that?R9 this year and R1 next year and pick 14 back to the Cats.
Or
R1 this year and Murdoch (no Gregson, no ****) and not a penny more.
No need to be like that - when a above me contains a trade with 4 picks and 3 players out of Geelong for Dangerfield. You ain't getting mountains of a gold for an out of contract player who will only go to one club.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
No point sending back our pick this year for your pick next year when it could be worse. We'd be better off trading it now for a known quantity like Redden.R9 this year and R1 next year and pick 14 back to the Cats.
Or
R1 this year and Murdoch (no Gregson, no ****) and not a penny more.
Aish is good but not that bloody good.![]()
Harry Taylor Taylor?has anyone thought of Taylor being included for the deal? I know that he is 29, but my thinking is that ready to go talent is better for our premiership window than draft picks.
You essentially having us giving 4 picks and 3 players for Dangerfield - that will never happen.Yeah, Brisbane give us Aish, and Geelong give Brisbane their picks and players. Pretty good trade for all parties, I reckon.
You essentially having us giving 4 picks and 3 players for Dangerfield - that will never happen.
Harry Taylor Taylor?
Geelong gain: Dangerfield
Geelong lose: Pick #9, Pick #28, 2016 first round pick, 2016 2nd round pick, Murdoch, GHS, Jansen
Everyone wins.
Oh really. What's make you think that?![]()
Oh good because there is no way he would come to your club - and at 29 it would be silly to get a player of his age when you won't be competing for a flag for a while.No, Brian Taylor.
Yeah, that guy.Harry Taylor Taylor?
Oh no! I think that he might be going guys!Apologies if it's already been mentioned, but seems Danger has removed any references to Adelaide on his Twitter and Instagram accounts.
Apologies if it's already been mentioned, but seems Danger has removed any references to Adelaide on his Twitter and Instagram accounts.
it would mean that he is 100000% gone now ... better demand the 3rd years first round draft pick.Apologies if it's already been mentioned, but seems Danger has removed any references to Adelaide on his Twitter and Instagram accounts.
It reminds me of when my teenage niece broke up with her boyfriend and first thing she did was change her relationship status on Facebook.Now there's something he definitely thought about doing! *boom tsh*
It reminds me of when my teenage niece broke up with her boyfriend and first thing she did was change her relationship status on Facebook.
I just think it is another example of him lacking class. He is still an Adelaide player I believe. Why not just leave it up until he has signed for another club? It just enforces the idea that he can't wait to leave. Disrespectful.
Why not just say former Adelaide player than remove all reference? Small I know but quite immature.Of all the things to criticise him for, I don't think removing references to Adelaide is it. Alternatively, if he still had these references, who is to say there wouldn't be people saying 'who does he think he's playing at?! Still listing Adelaide as his team?!' etc. etc. This is probably the 'cleanest', most 'no fuss' way he could have gone about addressing his Twitter account.
Easy draw? I think you forget the fact our coach was murdered half way through the year, the players had to cope with that and managed to get our shit together and make the finals. Soft draw is the biggest cop out criticism of all time.
Why not just say former Adelaide player than remove all reference? Small I know but quite immature.
Hmmm. I think a better deal would be:
Adelaide gain: Pick #9, Geelong's 2016 first round pick, Aish, Murdoch
Adelaide lose: Dangerfield
Brisbane gain: Pick #28, Geelong's 2016 2nd round pick, GHS, Jansen
Brisbane lose: Aish
Geelong gain: Dangerfield
Geelong lose: Pick #9, Pick #28, 2016 first round pick, 2016 2nd round pick, Murdoch, GHS, Jansen
Everyone wins.
Banned from a particular thread.What does Threadban mean?