Crankyhawk
Hall of Famer
Because people owning shares aren’t artificially driving up Prices for others to own housing (shares aren’t one of the basic needs of food warmth and shelter) and it’s easier to see how investment in shares (and I’d also allow commercial property) promotes jobs and economic activity. You don’t get those benefits from rental housing (particularly from existing construction)I had a mixed bag. One tenant paid 6 months ahead and rarely asked for anything. I didn't give them a single rent increase, and we only parted ways because they left the country.
Another tenant felt victimised because they were given warning notices for failing to pay on time, and that was after being continually late for over a year.
There's been a lot of angst against landlords recently, but I feel most of it is biased and unwarranted. Why are we comfortable with share investors if property investors are bad?




