Vic Daniel Andrews and the Statue of Limitations

[evolved2]

The EW $Billion is on Jeff's crew. Never go full Liberal nuffie.

Kennett had long retired from politics by then. Surely you're not blaming Jeff for that debacle?

 

[chickenonachain]

Has the Melbourne airport rail actually been canned as I was driving through Tullamarine today and there we’re works being done with signs saying it was the melb airport rail ?

 

[Theseventhhamster]

Kennett had long retired from politics by then. Surely you're not blaming Jeff for that debacle?

I mean you're blaming the incoming government that campaigned against it rather than the one that signed a contract for right before caretaker and then a secret side letter to force the contract and the billion in taxpayer money in compensation. I'm least identifying the correct party and clearly poking fun at your reverence for the lamentable campaigner Kennett. You're simping for the lot that did the vandalism for political point scoring.

Don't really see how you have a place to get pissy about accuracy here.

 

[FireKrakouer]

I mean you're blaming the incoming government that campaigned against it rather than the one that signed a contract for right before caretaker and then a secret side letter to force the contract and the billion in taxpayer money in compensation. I'm least identifying the correct party and clearly poking fun at your reverence for the lamentable campaigner Kennett. You're simping for the lot that did the vandalism for political point scoring.

Don't really see how you have a place to get pissy about accuracy here.

The "muh side letter" myth was perhaps the funniest of his lies thus far.
"Don't worry, we can rip up this deal without compensating the companies that are already owed hundreds of millions on it, that's how contracts work!"
[Election occurs]
"Hey... remember how I said I could cancel the contract for free? Funny story, but..."

 

[evolved2]

I mean you're blaming the incoming government that campaigned against it rather than the one that signed a contract for right before caretaker and then a secret side letter to force the contract and the billion in taxpayer money in compensation.

Nonsense. I've already posted that the Libs hold 90% of the blame for that debacle.
Vic - How would you rate Daniel Andrews' performance as Victorian Premier? - Part 7

I'm least identifying the correct party and clearly poking fun at your reverence for the lamentable campaigner Kennett. You're simping for the lot that did the vandalism for political point scoring.

No, you're failing to account for Dan's misleading election promise.

Don't really see how you have a place to get pissy about accuracy here.

I absolutely do!

 

[Theseventhhamster]

Nonsense. I've already posted that the Libs hold 90% of the blame for that debacle.
Vic - How would you rate Daniel Andrews' performance as Victorian Premier? - Part 7

No, you're failing to account for Dan's misleading election promise.

I absolutely do!

Right, so you were just shitposting then? Which now makes it weird that you're protesting about me calling you on it.

 

[Theseventhhamster]

The "muh side letter" myth was perhaps the funniest of his lies thus far.
"Don't worry, we can rip up this deal without compensating the companies that are already owed hundreds of millions on it, that's how contracts work!"
[Election occurs]
"Hey... remember how I said I could cancel the contract for free? Funny story, but..."

That you think this post makes a point is not surprising but you're not making a point here fashy boy. You thread banned everywhere else?

 

[evolved2]

Right, so you were just shitposting then? Which now makes it weird that you're protesting about me calling you on it.

You've lost me.

1. I compared Jeff to Dan, asking if Jeff ever paid millions/billions to ensure things weren't done.

You responded with an example that holds no relevance to Jeff's political career.

2. I responded by correcting you that Jeff retired well before the E/W debacle.

You responded by claiming that I'm simping for Jeff's team.

3. I pointed out that I hold Jeff's team responsible, even though the EW payout has nothing to do with Jeff and a bit to do with Dan.

You respond by accusing me of shitposting because you refuse to acknowledge when you're wrong.

 

[FireKrakouer]

That you think this post makes a point is not surprising but you're not making a point here fashy boy. You thread banned everywhere else?

There was no "side letter" required for the contract to be binding. The hint is in the word "contract" itself:
A contract is an agreement that specifies certain legally enforceable rights and obligations pertaining to two or more mutually agreeing parties.
Glad to help m8. Sorry to hear you were duped by the side letter thing!

 

[Theseventhhamster]

You've lost me.

1. I compared Jeff to Dan, asking if Jeff ever paid millions/billions to ensure things weren't done.

You responded with an example that holds no relevance to Jeff's political career.

2. I responded by correcting you that Jeff retired well before the E/W debacle.

You responded by claiming that I'm simping for Jeff's team.

3. I pointed out that I hold Jeff's team responsible, even though the EW payout has nothing to do with Jeff and a bit to do with Dan.

You respond by accusing me of shitposting because you refuse to acknowledge when you're wrong.

Yes you're shitposting. You tried to blame Labor for Liberal bastardry. It's basically the same shit as when the Murdoch types lose their mind and **** up easy criticism by dribbling over themselves. Like when there's obvious issues with hospital funding to drive home and they want to talk about a set of steps of Dan's missus' driving.

 

[evolved2]

Yes you're shitposting. You tried to blame Labor for Liberal bastardry. It's basically the same s**t as when the Murdoch types lose their mind and * up easy criticism by dribbling over themselves. Like when there's obvious issues with hospital funding to drive home and they want to talk about a set of steps of Dan's missus' driving.

I apportioned 90% of the blame to the LNP government of the time. The other 10% goes to Dan for lying to the electorate that breaking the contract wouldn't cost anything. No blame goes to Jeff because he was retired from politics at the time.

You continually refuse to approach the discussion rationally. Gralin is only giving you likes because he despises me.

 

[Sttew]

Has the Melbourne airport rail actually been canned as I was driving through Tullamarine today and there we’re works being done with signs saying it was the melb airport rail ?

Yes

 

[tandino]

ABC getting a bit spicy.

 

[Ghost Patrol]

All this fuss over $380m?

You couldn't even buy a French submarine with that.

 

[eddiesmith]

ABC getting a bit spicy.

$380 million is more than they give the states largest fire service to operate…

 

[MarcMaverick]

All this fuss over $380m?

You couldn't even buy a French submarine with that.

It's not "just" $380mil? It'll blow out just like everything else under his Kleptocracy Govt.

But never forget. Dan. Is. Never. Responsible.

 

[Theseventhhamster]

I apportioned 90% of the blame to the LNP government of the time. The other 10% goes to Dan for lying to the electorate that breaking the contract wouldn't cost anything. No blame goes to Jeff because he was retired from politics at the time.

You continually refuse to approach the discussion rationally. Gralin is only giving you likes because he despises me.

Defending yourself by saying you previously said something contradictory to the thing I've responded to now isn't the defence you think it is.

 

[Theseventhhamster]

Reckon the audacity to say he wasn't going to apologise for it was almost worse than wasting the cash personally.

 

[evolved2]

Defending yourself by saying you previously said something contradictory to the thing I've responded to now isn't the defence you think it is.

JFC. You're a typical Dan-fan.

 

[Theseventhhamster]

JFC. You're a typical Dan-fan.

Not even a little bit but thanks for melting about your own contradiction.

 

[evolved2]

Not even a little bit but thanks for melting about your own contradiction.

(a) What melt? (b) What contradiction?

I'm tempted to put you on ignore if you can't provide a semi-intelligent response to both questions.

 

[Theseventhhamster]

(a) What melt? (b) What contradiction?

I'm tempted to put you on ignore if you can't provide a semi-intelligent response to both questions.

Do what you want mate. I told you your billion dollar claim was rubbish and you pointed to some other time you said something completely different. You're spamming and melting over it. I don't care.

 

[evolved2]

Do what you want mate.

That's what I do.

I told you your billion dollar claim was rubbish

What billion dollar claim?

and you pointed to some other time you said something completely different.

Another claim made without evidence. You should cop a day off for every unsupported claim you make.

You're spamming and melting over it. I don't care.

Nonsense. You're not intelligent enough to be worthy of my attention, so on ignore you go. Goodbye.

 

[Theseventhhamster]

def not melting tho.

 

[Pakenhamsaint]

Victoria is headed in a dark direction indeed. Remember how Melbourne used to be consistently voted the most liveable city on earth, prior to it becoming Dan's Kleptocracy?

Anyone who takes that "world's most liable city" stuff seriously is a fool.

It is absolutely meaningless to the average person in the street.