Daniel Kerr

[starchamber]

What do people think on Daniel Kerr? I know his been injured a bit and missed a lot of footy but would he be a player wanted if he wanted out.I would never give up much for him but if he wasn't going for much a straight swap or later pick would we take a chance or do you think his finished? He was a gun playing with Judd.

 

[Malifice]

NO

Just no.

Injury plauged, suspension prone, trouble making, presription forging, criminal associating, cab bashing, disruptive 27 y/o ********.

Just no.

 

[Aphrodite]

Oh dear, not again

 

[Blues_Man]

What do people think on Daniel Kerr? I know his been injured a bit and missed a lot of footy but would he be a player wanted if he wanted out.I would never give up much for him but if he wasn't going for much a straight swap or later pick would we take a chance or do you think his finished? He was a gun playing with Judd.

Yes great idea ! and while we are at it lets go after Fletcher from the Dons ..and perhaps M'cleod and Burton from the Crows .

 

[Silvagnis]

Straight swap for Garlett and Yarran.

A Michael Voss type recruiting spree is what we need to become a contender for the flag.

 

[starchamber]

NO

Just no.

Injury plauged, suspension prone, trouble making, presription forging, criminal associating, cab bashing, disruptive 27 y/o ********.

Just no.

O.K a good discusssion Injury plauged,too risky,so it's a no.It's no sweat off my back.The age is nothing although as Judd the same but the other points are valid.

 

[starchamber]

Straight swap for Garlett and Yarran.

A Michael Voss type recruiting spree is what we need to become a contender for the flag.

You Idiot a swap for them wouldn't benefit us. I was thinking more like a Steven Browne and a late pick.A pick or player who wouldn't get much run for us.

 

[Malifice]

A Michael Voss type recruiting spree is what we need to become a contender for the flag.

Working wonders for the Bears.

 

[Aphrodite]

Originally Posted by TheGeneral
Straight swap for Garlett and Yarran.

A Michael Voss type recruiting spree is what we need to become a contender for the flag.

You Idiot a swap for them wouldn't benefit us. I was thinking more like a Steven Browne and a late pick.A pick or player who wouldn't get much run for us.

That will not go down well with TG ............

 

[SpaceCow]

Yes great idea ! and while we are at it lets go after Fletcher from the Dons ..and perhaps M'cleod and Burton from the Crows .

While we're at it we should also coax Lloydy out of retirement!

 

[Malifice]

You Idiot a swap for them wouldn't benefit us. I was thinking more like a Steven Browne and a late pick.

Browne + (a late pick in a compromised draft) does not = Kerr.

As much as he is a ******** he is still a great player.

For what he is worth (football wise) I wouldnt be prepapred to pay.

WCE are stuck with him.

They deserve each other.

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

I would take him if we didn't have to give up any player or a top draft pick. Therefore it wouldn't happen.

Reckon Judd would flourish with Kerr working for him.

 

[Blue since 72]

Straight swap for Garlett and Yarran.

A Michael Voss type recruiting spree is what we need to become a contender for the flag.

Originally Posted by starchamber
You Idiot a swap for them wouldn't benefit us. I was thinking more like a Steven Browne and a late pick.A pick or player who wouldn't get much run for us.


Yeah you idiot. Sheesh you have no idea.

Vossy's done wonders for the Carlton football club.

 

[Blue since 72]

And for what its worth;

Thats what we need, another in and under bull terrier who is not only injury prone like the two we have but suspension prone too.

The lets get Daniel Kerr boat sailed a few years ago starman.

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

And for what its worth;

Thats what we need, another in and under bull terrier who is not only injury prone like the two we have but suspension prone too.

The lets get Daniel Kerr boat sailed a few years ago starman.

Depends. Does a physical, get him for very little, Hadley out, older, wiser, hopefully reformed a la Barry Hall ... could be good.

As stated, it is all hypothetical but I am not convinced that we aren't taking too many moral stances against older, troubled players because Fev bit us so hard. Some clubs are actually turning these guys around. Saints and Gardiner, Tigers and Cousins, Dogs and Hall.

He won't get to us in the PSD and we can't satisfy West Coast in a trade, and wouldn't want to as we have greater deficiencies. He'd be an upgrade on the other two for sure.

 

[Chism]

You Idiot a swap for them wouldn't benefit us. I was thinking more like a Steven Browne and a late pick.A pick or player who wouldn't get much run for us.

Depends. Does a physical, get him for very little, Hadley out, older, wiser, hopefully reformed a la Barry Hall ... could be good.

As stated, it is all hypothetical but I am not convinced that we aren't taking too many moral stances against older, troubled players because Fev bit us so hard. Some clubs are actually turning these guys around. Saints and Gardiner, Tigers and Cousins, Dogs and Hall.

He won't get to us in the PSD and we can't satisfy West Coast in a trade, and wouldn't want to as we have greater deficiencies. He'd be an upgrade on the other two for sure.

This^^^^^^. My thoughts exactly.

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

That cat looks like he is about to lose his lunch.

 

[starchamber]

Depends. Does a physical, get him for very little, Hadley out, older, wiser, hopefully reformed a la Barry Hall ... could be good.

As stated, it is all hypothetical but I am not convinced that we aren't taking too many moral stances against older, troubled players because Fev bit us so hard. Some clubs are actually turning these guys around. Saints and Gardiner, Tigers and Cousins, Dogs and Hall.

He won't get to us in the PSD and we can't satisfy West Coast in a trade, and wouldn't want to as we have greater deficiencies. He'd be an upgrade on the other two for sure.

This is what i'm saying i'm not stupid to give away a pick near top 10 or 20 for him or a valuable player.I'm saying if it cost a player who is most likely to be delisted in a few seasons and a later pick why not if he pass all tests.

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

This is what i'm saying i'm not stupid to give away a pick near top 10 or 20 for him or a valuable player.I'm saying if it cost a player who is most likely to be delisted in a few seasons and a later pick why not if he pass all tests.

Oh so we agree?

I'd hereby like to recant my opinion and take up an opposing position.

 

[Blue since 72]

Depends. Does a physical, get him for very little, Hadley out, older, wiser, hopefully reformed a la Barry Hall ... could be good.

As stated, it is all hypothetical but I am not convinced that we aren't taking too many moral stances against older, troubled players because Fev bit us so hard. Some clubs are actually turning these guys around. Saints and Gardiner, Tigers and Cousins, Dogs and Hall.

He won't get to us in the PSD and we can't satisfy West Coast in a trade, and wouldn't want to as we have greater deficiencies. He'd be an upgrade on the other two for sure.

As you mentioned in your first post both clubs wouldn't be able to satisfy each other anyway so its a mute point, but assuming his body held up, which with advancing years and a game that is increasing in pace I think would be unlikely and my belief that he won't/can't change his spots re acts incurring suspension I wouldn't bother.

However, solely based on ability then yes, he is better than Brock or Dick.

 

[Caj]

This is what i'm saying i'm not stupid to give away a pick near top 10 or 20 for him or a valuable player.I'm saying if it cost a player who is most likely to be delisted in a few seasons and a later pick why not if he pass all tests.

Yep I'm sure West Coast would jump at a deal like that

 

[anti_]

cant see it happening.

west coast would want a first rounder, yet hardly any teams would give that up for kerr as he hasnt played consistent footy since 2007.

his value is less than what we're prepared to trade him for. therefore, we're stuck with him.

 

[Mister Carlton]

Take Ellard.

 

[Malifice]

his value is less than what we're prepared to trade him for. therefore, we're stuck with him.

My thoughts exactly.

Possible offload to GC17 being your only chance.

 

[Hank_Hill]

This is what i'm saying i'm not stupid to give away a pick near top 10 or 20 for him or a valuable player.I'm saying if it cost a player who is most likely to be delisted in a few seasons and a later pick why not if he pass all tests.

It wouldn't be the first time we gave away good picks for a dud. Mclean is a good example of that. Kerr is a much better player then Mclean so i can't see why not give up another high pick for a seasoned player.