might actually have a sub with pace and skill now
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That may be the case but its an easy offer to match and for only pick 25 we will play hard ball...hes is not going to Freo via the draft you will have to trade or we do a deal elsewhere
No we will match the offer ...the AFL are putting 25 on the table compo not enough..your 15 pick gets it done though
What are you talking about??
"Putting 25 on the table compo"?
"Our 15 pick gets it done"?
You have no idea what the compensation will be, you'd first need to know what he's being offered, you'd then need to know how the $$$p/a & contract length would correlate to the AFL's compensation system for FA - which to my knowledge hasn't been made public.
And in regards to "our 15", we have 16, not 15, and it's not trade period, it's Free Agency period. Come trade period if a FA deal isn't done I doubt we'll be pursuing Pearce with our 1st pick. We haven't traded our 1st pick ever under the current drafts & list management team and it's not about to start for one Danyle Pearce.
No we hear the offer from the AFL is pick 25 ....just not enough we can do and will do better trade week...he will not go into the draft
That may be the case but its an easy offer to match and for only pick 25 we will play hard ball...hes is not going to Freo via the draft you will have to trade or we do a deal elsewhere
There's no doubt, it's raining s**t over at Port Adelaide with Pearce, Richmond's getting Troy Chaplin and Rodan & Surjan are heading to a Melbourne based club in the next 7 days. Maybe this is why they're after picks so much, because they'll have no choice but to take 5-6 picks this draft and it's better to have other means than just using 4th, 5th & 6th rd picks.
Really are some tough times ahead at Port. A longer visit at the depths of the table may be required along with some astute list management (no pain - no gain theory). They've got the first thing very right with the appointment of Leon Cameron to coach. Held in very high regard around the AFL. Really hope they don't implode too much under debt and politics before he can knit a handy team together.There's no doubt, it's raining s**t over at Port Adelaide with Pearce, Richmond's getting Troy Chaplin and Rodan & Surjan are heading to a Melbourne based club in the next 7 days. Maybe this is why they're after picks so much, because they'll have no choice but to take 5-6 picks this draft and it's better to have other means than just using 4th, 5th & 6th rd picks.
Is that even close to official yet? I am yet to see anything to confirm it and it is still just "the most likely" rumor from what I can gather?!Really are some tough times ahead at Port. A longer visit at the depths of the table may be required along with some astute list management (no pain - no gain theory). They've got the first thing very right with the appointment of Leon Cameron to coach. Held in very high regard around the AFL. Really hope they don't implode too much under debt and politics before he can knit a handy team together.
Losing some players like Pearce now may reward Port in the future far more than holding out in hope for the next few seasons.
Do not rate Pearce when it comes to the crunch. Could see him helping the side win games in the regular season, then go missing in September. Players like Pearce often do not deliver in the trench warfare of finals.
Look at Sydney and Hawthorn ... both sides had basically minimal impact from the flashy, quick, outside running types (e.g. Young, Rioli, Smith, Ellis, Jetta).
It is worth mentioning he is 179cm and 77kg. Physically, he is small and weak. This doesn't automatically preclude him from being useful in the crunch, but it certainly doesn't help either.
I hope Lyon and co. know what they're doing, because I'm afraid this is going to be a big mistake.
Pretty damned sure they know better than the lot of us combined mate.Do not rate Pearce when it comes to the crunch. Could see him helping the side win games in the regular season, then go missing in September. Players like Pearce often do not deliver in the trench warfare of finals.
Look at Sydney and Hawthorn ... both sides had basically minimal impact from the flashy, quick, outside running types (e.g. Young, Rioli, Smith, Ellis, Jetta).
It is worth mentioning he is 179cm and 77kg. Physically, he is small and weak. This doesn't automatically preclude him from being useful in the crunch, but it certainly doesn't help either.
I hope Lyon and co. know what they're doing, because I'm afraid this is going to be a big mistake.
Do not rate Pearce when it comes to the crunch. Could see him helping the side win games in the regular season, then go missing in September. Players like Pearce often do not deliver in the trench warfare of finals.
Look at Sydney and Hawthorn ... both sides had basically minimal impact from the flashy, quick, outside running types (e.g. Young, Rioli, Smith, Ellis, Jetta).
It is worth mentioning he is 179cm and 77kg. Physically, he is small and weak. This doesn't automatically preclude him from being useful in the crunch, but it certainly doesn't help either.
I hope Lyon and co. know what they're doing, because I'm afraid this is going to be a big mistake.
Big mistake? How could it possibly be a big mistake? Sounds like he's on a generous contract, but not a crippling one. What could possibly be the biggest downside of him signing with us?
Pearce will play some very good football for us, will add a lot to the side. A very smart signing, though not the big fish I would have liked considering the utensil up last year.
God damn, did you read that back to yourself before you hit post reply?
If he is on 400-500k for multiple years and doesn't perform, that is not something to just sweep under the rug ... it is significant money that could be used elsewhere. If he plays in a grand final, and goes missing like so many other soft/outside types, then that will be a big mistake.
Look at Sydney and Hawthorn ... both sides had basically minimal impact from the flashy, quick, outside running types (e.g. Young, Rioli, Smith, Ellis, Jetta).
Might be onto something here, can we withdraw the Form 41?Look at Sydney and Hawthorn ... both sides had basically minimal impact from the flashy, quick, outside running types (e.g. Young, Rioli, Smith, Ellis, Jetta).