- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Posts
- 17,679
- Reaction score
- 23,477
- Location
- Western Victoria
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions

- Other Teams
- Chelsea
Surely Phil Hughes should be smart enough to realise his own technical flaws and work on them himself? He seems like an intelligent guy.
He does now, but for years he had muppets parading as personal coaches and advisors pumping up his tyres and telling him that everything was ok and his technique was fine - that's the problem.
The funniest thing I saw or read over the whole Test Series was an article that ran in fairfax press with self appointed cricket coaching "guru" - Neil D'Costa analysing the flaws in our batsmen. What he actually wrote was pretty spot on, however, he bandies himself around as the guy who made Michael Clarke and now Phil Hughes. He didn't critique Phil Hughes which was funny given he was in charge of him for years and allowed him to continue with such a massive flaw in his game during his formative years that it has potentially cruelled his international career.
Hughes should have been next after Ponting and Clarke as Australian batting geniuses - that he is not has a lot to do with this "guru".
I will add - every few weeks I see "talented" kids playing in my own junior comps. But I still see technical flaws in their games. I'll happily pass on my advice and knowledge and I get some mild comfort from seeing kids that take up my advice and improve and become better players and some now adult coaches in their own right.
But often I get the nah I'm making runs I don't need to make any changes or what I would call the if it aint broke don't fix it mentality. Batting in cricket hasn't changed a lot in terms of technical basics over a long period of time and few if any can defy those basics. I want kids to be able to play and enjoy the game at whatever level they want but nothing stifles batting more than poor technique. Get it right at the bottom and fix big flaws early and the rest is a lot easier.








