Not the same as this year. I don't want him being beaten badly every other time he actually has an opponent.
He was shaded by Jones, Armfield, Rawlings in the second North game, Smith, Picken etc.
So in the end all you want is for him to improve the quality of his poor games? Thats fair but its hardly that much of an improvement on this yr and hardly suggests that Hill's 2011 was terrible.
I'm not entirely convinced Hill will ever be as good as Mcleod or Matera, I get the feeling that he will be more of your Wells type player mostly because of his size. But to me Wells is still a very good player, with IMO possibly the best disposal in the league which often gets overlooked and I'd be happy with that but perhaps it doesnt quite live up to the expectations that most people have of Hill. Unfortunately I think Hill will all be susceptible to a very good tag cos he just isnt big enough.







